[AntiGuv]

We would disagree on the randomness that's a necessity of the evolution model.

If indeed we did, then one or both of us would be wrong. If it were only one, then that would almost certainly be you.

Also, there's plenty of evidence of a deity.

If there were any evidence of a deity, much less plenty, we wouldn't be having this debate.

So far as our worldview imposing limitations of our ability to speculate, it's a given in many other disciplines. Therefore, it makes sense here.

Nor did I dispute that.

Just so I know where you're coming from: Using standard definitions, I am a religious person (see my tagline.) Are you?

No.

[xzins]

I think I will be able to find plenty of quotes from evolutionists who will use the "randomness" word and/or synonymous language in describing their view.

You don't deny I'll be able to find those, do you?