Posted on 05/22/2005 7:30:03 AM PDT by Dada Orwell
That's what Mohammed Atta said.
His heart is in the right place, but his head is up his ass.
"I will either board the plane without I.D. or be arrested,"
Your choice, buddy. Yes, it's a free country and you get to choose.
I guess the government will slowly begin providing these "freestaters" a new place to live. Overall IQ of New Hampshire must have dropped 20 points when those morons moved to the State.
Hope he's read MLK, Jr's "Letter from the Birmingham Jail", is prepared to be arrested, because that's what non-violent protest and civil disobedience is all about.
"In a free country you do not need government permission to travel."
In a free country at war, perhaps you do.
If the airport authorities are smart, they will be ready for him and won't give him any time to turn things into a media circus. They should immediately hustle him out the back into a waiting police car. The media won't even have time to focus their cameras and it will be all over.
Then take a hike.
In a free country private companies like airlines can make any agreement with a governmental authority they wish. If Delta or United agrees to allow governmental authorities to prescreen passengers, and you object, fly on an airline that doesn't, if you can find one. Or buy your own plane, or car or walk. Freedom isn't license
It sure did. The FSP helped turn NH from 'red' to 'blue'.
"No one has ever been killed because of lax licensing in manicure"
Killed, perhaps No, but I suggest you look at stats that show the number of injuries and infections cause by both licensed and non-licensed manicurists. Do you see any reason to license physicians, nurses or healthcare professionals? Do you see any reason to license drivers?
Nobody said he needed an ID to travel. just to do it on an airplane. Big difference. Nuance is obviously not this guy's stong suit.
1000's of people were killed because terrorists crashed airplanes into buildings. For that to happen the attackers needed to get thru' flight school, plan the attacks, get financing for the attacks, get US visas, get past the US border, get past airport security, overpower pilots, etc. These attacks didn't happen just "because of lax security at airports", lax security was one of the elements that allowed them to happen - huge difference.
They could just refuse let him pass OR arrest him. What's he gonna do, throw a tantrum?
Or better yet, sign, and cross out and initial the language relating to perjury.
In a free country at war, perhaps you do.
No. Not unless you're on probation for some crime or otherwise restricted by law.
But, nobody is saying this guy cannot travel or does not have a right to travel. He is being told he cannot use certain modes of travel unless he conforms and submits to certain reasonable screening requirements. He's an idiot.
Granted, the airlines may have been coerced into requiring this sort of security. However, they have chosen to do this. And, seriously, in the wake of 9/11, I think the airlines would have voluntarily chosen to cooperate with the government no-fly list, even had they been given an option.
Now, if someday the government required all cars have a GPS system, so that their location could be monitored (which is being suggested in some states, more as means of taxation, rather than security) and Mr. Kanning removed the GPS from his car and drove around, he would have a parallel action to the manicurist.... But this has the wrong target.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.