Your problem starts there. You have a completely subjective opinion.
Perhaps. But I'd prefer to be found guilty of thinking than not thinking.
How do you know that? Maybe Playboy porn is already too much for men to take? Or maybe not?
Perhaps. Playboy is the porn equivalent of a beer, whereas Hustler is the porn equivalent of crack-cocaine. Beer does damage, but it is considered an acceptable risk. Crack is not.
Such as gynecological textbooks? Should only gynecologists see them?
Oh please. Find me a gynecologist who is also a porn addict. Being a gyno has the exact opposite effect from everything I've heard...
I wrote:
The auto-sexual pleasure some derive from it is far outweighed by the damage it inflicts on society at large.
You wrote:
And you got this from what? How about the damage that arbitrary bans based on personal taste and getting into other people's business does to personal liberty and free expression?
Where did I get it? Practically verbatim from the US Supreme Court. See post 149. This is how Americans thought prior to the Cultural Revolution of the 1960s.
Current Communist Goals, ca. 1964
24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.
25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.
26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."
They sure did a great job brainwashing a lot of you folks...