Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

letting the FBI subpoena records without permission from a judge or grand jury.

IMHO, this is clearly unconstitutional.

1 posted on 05/18/2005 5:58:44 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: wagglebee
IMHO, this is clearly unconstitutional.

Agreed. If they need the subpoena in a hurry, they can call the judge at night and get him out of bed and make their case.

2 posted on 05/18/2005 6:08:21 PM PDT by Numbers Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

I don't think extending IRS powers to the FBI is a good idea, unless they are sunsetted.


3 posted on 05/18/2005 6:11:41 PM PDT by crazyhorse691 (We won. We don't need to be forgiving. Let the heads roll!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

"or other evidence in terrorism investigations"

Oh. Are they going to rewrite the law to actually be limited to terrorism investigations, or are they just going to pretend it is so limited like they did the first time?

"Recipients could challenge the subpoenas in court and the Bush administration would have to report to Congress twice a year exactly how it was using this investigatory power, the aides said."

Oh, make a "report." I feel safe with that.

< /sarcasm>


4 posted on 05/18/2005 6:12:11 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
IMHO, this is clearly unconstitutional.

Agreed. Yet another reason no viable political party has my vote at the moment.

5 posted on 05/18/2005 6:17:10 PM PDT by steve86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
expand government powers in the name of fighting terrorism

Oh goody, I can't wait. I'm sure we'll be confiscating a lot more Whizzinators at the airport in the name of national security.

8 posted on 05/18/2005 6:27:01 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
...But the measure being written by Sen. Pat Roberts, R-Kan., would give the FBI new power to issue administrative subpoenas, which are not reviewed by a judge or grand jury, for quickly obtaining records, electronic data ...

The Fourth Amendment:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

10 posted on 05/18/2005 6:46:55 PM PDT by FReepaholic (When I read about the evils of drinking, I gave up reading)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

For some reason, I'm a little skeptical of more "anonymous" sources, and will wait to see.

I wonder how many papers will print a story like this right next to the Star Wars reviews tomorrow? Mine will.


11 posted on 05/18/2005 6:47:52 PM PDT by soloNYer (Albany Slimes Union: trying to get to the left of their heroes the New York Slimes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

HELL NO!


13 posted on 05/18/2005 6:55:21 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan (Fire Stabenow in 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

bump


17 posted on 05/18/2005 7:09:21 PM PDT by ellery (The true danger is when liberty is nibbled away, for expedience, and by parts. - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
Makes a person wonder what the PTB have on ole Pat Roberts (R) Kansas or what he's been promised...can't believe he just thought this crap up on his own and decided he needed to do it for the sake of the nation...

imo

22 posted on 05/18/2005 8:37:50 PM PDT by joesnuffy (The generation that survived the depression and won WW2 proved poverty does not cause crime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Have you ever thought to consider that maybe the Administration knows that a certain % of judges are sympathetic to the Islamofascist movement?


24 posted on 05/18/2005 8:51:14 PM PDT by bamaborn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
I wonder if this is just a leak to stir up trouble, or if they are actually planing to pass this.

If the former, well that is par for the course. The latter? Well, then the Republic and Constitution are just about dead.
26 posted on 05/19/2005 6:00:02 AM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

This is a Assoc Press "reporter", meaning a DNC operative, I will wait to see it for myself.


27 posted on 05/19/2005 6:04:04 AM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
IMHO, this is clearly unconstitutional.

But it's ok, because Republicans are in power, and the democrats aren't, right? There's no chance that a democrat will ever have these powers at their disposal, right??

Am I sounding sarcastic or cynical this mornig :-)
29 posted on 05/19/2005 6:49:48 AM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson