Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee
IMHO, this is clearly unconstitutional.

Agreed. Yet another reason no viable political party has my vote at the moment.

5 posted on 05/18/2005 6:17:10 PM PDT by steve86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BearWash

When you read this stuff, keep it all in perspective. Remember:

The "Security Check" at the airport is for your safety, to make sure no terrorists get on, it is not an unreasonable search and siezure.

It may be hard to remember this when you are arrested for some form of contraband. Rock stars' dope comes to mind. Marijuana is clearly the weapon of choice for terrorist hijackers.

Remember "DUI" checkpoints are a special case to check for drunk drivers. They are not unreasonable search and siezure. It may be hard to remember this when you get arrested for not remembering your driver's license. You are a special case, too.

This is another case of a government trying to expand its span of control using the "Safety" cover.

"Those who would sacrifice lliberty for safety will soon have neither."
- Benjamin Franklin


7 posted on 05/18/2005 6:26:23 PM PDT by Rodentking (http://www.airpower.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: BearWash
MHO, this is clearly unconstitutional.

Agreed. Yet another reason no viable political party has my vote at the moment.

Agreed.

9 posted on 05/18/2005 6:45:09 PM PDT by Dubya (Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father,but by me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson