Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Fresh query' over Galloway fund
BBC ^ | 5/18/05

Posted on 05/18/2005 7:35:11 AM PDT by Valin

UK MP George Galloway could face a new inquiry into the finances of an appeal he set up to help a sick Iraqi girl. The Charity Commission has said it will contact US senators investigating claims Mr Galloway was given credits for Iraqi oil by Saddam Hussein. The UK body is keen to see US evidence concerning Mr Galloway's Mariam Appeal. The MP denies funds from the sale of oil were funnelled through the appeal. He told senators a previous Commission inquiry had found no impropriety.

Inquiry 'limitations'

Mr Galloway accused the US Senate investigations sub-committee of being "cavalier" with justice during his appearance in Washington on Tuesday. He said the Commission's inquiry into the appeal, set up in 1998 to help a four-year-old Iraqi girl with leukaemia, had recovered "all money in and all money out". However, the head of legal services for the Charity Commission, Kenneth Dibble, said there had been "limitations" on its investigation.

Some of the records for the appeal had been taken out of the country by its then chairman, Jordanian businessman Fawaz Zureikat, Mr Dibble told BBC Radio 4's Today programme. This meant investigators had to "reconstruct" the income and expenditure of the appeal fund by looking at its bank accounts, he said. "With the help of the trustees... we were able to establish at least that the majority of the monies were applied for purposes that were charitable," he said.

The Charity Commission has now asked to see the US senators' evidence in order to establish if further action is needed. Mr Dibble said: "We would have to consider whether or not they were aware of any improper nature of funds coming to the charity if indeed we find there is evidence to support that."

'No oil deal'

No-one was available to comment at Mr Galloway's office. Speaking after the Senate hearing, Mr Galloway claimed victory in his fight to clear his name. The Respect MP claims the evidence against him is false. He says forged documents have been used against him in the past. One of the main allegations raised by the Senate sub-committee is that Mr Galloway received oil allocations with the assistance of Mr Zureikat.

The UN-backed oil-for-food scheme enabled Saddam Hussein to export oil to pay for essential humanitarian aid to help the Iraqi people cope with UN sanctions imposed in 1991. Options to buy barrels of Iraqi oil were alleged to have been given as rewards for supporting Saddam. The MP said Mr Zureikat had donated money to the Mariam Appeal, but he "never gave me a penny from an oil deal, a cake deal, a bread deal or from any other deal".

In December, Mr Galloway won £150,000 in libel damages from the Daily Telegraph over its separate claims he had received money from Saddam's regime. Last month the newspaper won permission to appeal against the ruling to pay the damages, plus £1.2m in costs.

Mr Galloway narrowly beat Labour's Oona King to win the Bethnal Green and Bow constituency, in East London, in this month's UK general election.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: galloway; georgegalloway; oilforfood

1 posted on 05/18/2005 7:35:11 AM PDT by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Valin

I heard Mr. Galloway's answers. He sounded slick and unconvincing... Kind of like a former President of ours, Bill Clinton.

Some of his answers were rather detailed in what he did not do, and was not involved in, but he didn't exactly answer the charges. While he denied every owning, selling, or allowing someone to sell own or sell oil on his behalf, I didn't hear him address the fact that he is accused of receiving and selling "options" for Iraqi oil. That is, he didn't ever own or sell oil, or allow someone to do either on his behalf, but options for the purchase of Iraqi oil are a different commodity than the actual barrels.

Slick and unconvincing, and very insulting, since he lied in the first place about never receiving an invitation to appear before the committee. Only after the committee responded to his lies with a note that invited him again to appear at the hearing did he appear.

Bleh...


2 posted on 05/18/2005 7:41:11 AM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coconutt2000

He's mighty slippery. I hope they can nab him. I don't think "forged evidence" is going to fly, but who knows.


3 posted on 05/18/2005 7:47:07 AM PDT by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson