Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pollyannaish

No, the filibuster was always intended to shut things down. Only Hollywood could make it look intersting. Also, the new rules are what prevents the old fashioned kind.


226 posted on 05/16/2005 9:19:33 PM PDT by ShowMeMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies ]


To: ShowMeMom

yeah , I had a teacher that read us some of the obtuse stuff from a bygone era that was read aloud for filibustering , someone even read some sort of textbook unrelated to anything going on


233 posted on 05/16/2005 9:24:06 PM PDT by Dad yer funny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]

To: ShowMeMom
Ah. I need to do more homework I think. So, if the shoe is ever on the other foot, we can still filibuster...we just have to do it in public so that it is more transparent.

Hmm...why isn't the press on board here? Isn't that what they always are screaming for—a more transparent government. /eye roll

244 posted on 05/16/2005 9:28:31 PM PDT by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson