To: txrangerette
A whole lot more is going on with you than that.
Yes, I've already noted my disagreement with the small group that thinks Condoleezza Rice is viable as a successor to President Bush, which she is not.
85 posted on
05/15/2005 2:21:43 AM PDT by
advance_copy
(Stand for life, or nothing at all)
To: advance_copy; txrangerette
Another example of nobody on this thread declaring Condi Rice as a viable successor to President Bush........
You sir! are delusional
87 posted on
05/15/2005 2:24:12 AM PDT by
MJY1288
( By Comparison...."Dingy" Harry Reid makes Tom Daschle look like a Statesman)
To: advance_copy
Re: Condi as a viable as a successor to President Bush.
You say she is not, post after post after post. Excluding reason number one why she isn't viable (she's not going to run) give some reasons, please.
91 posted on
05/15/2005 2:25:37 AM PDT by
endthematrix
(Declare 2005 as the year the battle for freedom from tax slavery!)
To: advance_copy
Your comments directed at MJY are totally misplaced. He indicated nothing of the kind. That's why we note that something far out would appear to be going on with you.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson