Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Your Nightmare
The fairtax crowd silence is deafening on this thread.
3 posted on 05/12/2005 8:41:59 PM PDT by lewislynn (My other car is an XC90 T6 AWD....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lewislynn

I bet the committee members have not read the following paper:
J Heckman, L. Lochner and C. Taber, "Tax policy and Human Capital Formation," American Economic Review, (May 1998), 88(2), 293-297.

Don't hold your breath for the committee or any opponent to actually read it.


4 posted on 05/12/2005 9:02:12 PM PDT by econ_grad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: lewislynn
I'm all for the fair tax, but first they had better repeal the 16th amendment and destroy the IRS before making it law. If not, then god help us, the federal government will then have two taxes in which to tax us to death, one on our incomes and another in the stuff we buy. Two scary to think about.
5 posted on 05/12/2005 9:03:38 PM PDT by libertarianben (Looking for sanity and his hard to find cousin common sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: lewislynn

Amazing isn't it?


10 posted on 05/12/2005 9:51:49 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: lewislynn; ancient_geezer; pigdog
The fairtax crowd silence is deafening on this thread.

What's silent is your pings to fair tax supporters. You didn't want them around?

20 posted on 05/13/2005 8:36:49 AM PDT by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: lewislynn
The fairtax crowd silence is deafening on this thread.

Patience, hasty. Yours was only the third post.

27 posted on 05/13/2005 8:48:58 AM PDT by Terabitten (I have a duty as an AMERICAN, not a Republican. We can never put Party above Nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: lewislynn; Taxman; pigdog; Principled; EternalVigilance; rwrcpa1; phil_will1; kevkrom; ...

lewislynn:The fairtax crowd silence is deafening on this thread.

LOL, I wasn't aware that people are held to a time clock on noticing posts.

However since you are apparently feeling lonely today, I am sure something can be done to alleviate your problem.

 

A Taxreform bump for you all.

If you would like to be added to this ping list let me know.

John Linder in the House(HR25) & Saxby Chambliss Senate(S25), offer a comprehensive bill to kill all income and SS/Medicare payroll taxes outright, and provide a IRS free replacement in the form of a retail sales tax:

H.R.25,S.25
A bill to promote freedom, fairness, and economic opportunity by repealing the income tax and other taxes, abolishing the Internal Revenue Service, and enacting a national retail sales tax to be administered primarily by the States.

Refer for additional information:


39 posted on 05/13/2005 9:15:32 AM PDT by ancient_geezer (Don't reform it, Replace it!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: lewislynn
The fairtax crowd silence is deafening on this thread.

Well excuse me, I've been having lunch. Funny how you hear silence before four posts have been made.

52 posted on 05/13/2005 10:04:00 AM PDT by groanup (http://fairtax.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: lewislynn
The fairtax crowd silence is deafening on this thread.

On the third post you say that?

174 posted on 05/16/2005 4:41:34 AM PDT by SeeRushToldU_So (Flashback.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: lewislynn

"The fairtax crowd silence is deafening on this thread."

Hey, I'm for it!

The big problem I see with any tax of this type is that it would make it to obvious for people to see how much money they really pay in taxes.


830 posted on 05/20/2005 1:49:14 PM PDT by e_castillo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: lewislynn

I'm in favor of a national retail sales tax IF it replaces an income tax.

Why did the founding fathers have problems with an income tax?

Do I accept the view that those who make more should pay a higher PERCENTAGE of their income in tax?

If the issue is maintaining the current amount of money received, cannot that be mathematically determined based on national sales figures?


1,094 posted on 05/24/2005 7:02:41 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: lewislynn

"The fairtax crowd silence is deafening on this thread."

LMAO!! Little quick to form conclusions, aren't we, Louie?

Let it be noted that that was post #3 of more than 1200 and counting. Typical of the guardians of the status quo.


1,246 posted on 05/24/2005 7:31:22 PM PDT by phil_will1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: lewislynn

The fair tax is the way to go. As it is presented, 23% is revenue neutral. This panel hasn't read enough on the subject.


1,466 posted on 08/19/2005 2:19:05 PM PDT by SALChamps03
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson