It is quite apparent that youDO have some sort of interest in the present system.Yeah, that's why I want to replace it.
Jane Gravelle is with the CRS - Congressional Research Service and they are a group which "officially" take no positions (yeah, right) on economic issues but merely "advise and clarify" for the pore dumb congresscats.The CRS analyzes lots of stuff, most probably having nothing to do with taxes. They would have plenty of work to do if we had the FairTax, too. And you still haven't pointed out one thing that you found biased in the paper. Did you even read it?
If you're dumb enough to believe they don't have their raison d'etre wholly intertwined with the public trough and thereby the present tax system then you're pretty dumb and don't realize that they "analyze" deductions, etc. for charitable giving, etc. to let congresscats know which way is up.
Perhaps it is YOU that needs to find out what CRS, JCT, etc. do any why they have helped us arrive where we are tax-wise. Go sell your inane notions elsewhere. Bias is bias and they have as least as much as you.Pathetic. You really don't have any idea what the CRS is, do you?
"Most, PROBABLY having nothing to do with taxes ..."??? You don't know I see but post blithely away nevertheless. Their workload would be drastically cut since much of what they do is tax related in one way or another. Study some of their papers sometimes if you can find any that are not biased to the Status Quo - that's where they live and put bread on the table now.
This is merely getting to be one of your pointless sidetracking attempts I see.
Since you "want to replace it" (the present system) why is it you don't know two hoots in hell about anything but a Nightmare VAT (or Nightmare Flat) tax that is only a vague theoretical dream??? Let's see your plan in intimate detail otherwise it will be apparent to anyone with a shred of smarts that you really ARE a phony and a fraud trying by nefarious means to defend the SQL notions.