"Most, PROBABLY having nothing to do with taxes ..."??? You don't know I see but post blithely away nevertheless. Their workload would be drastically cut since much of what they do is tax related in one way or another. Study some of their papers sometimes if you can find any that are not biased to the Status Quo - that's where they live and put bread on the table now.
This is merely getting to be one of your pointless sidetracking attempts I see.
Since you "want to replace it" (the present system) why is it you don't know two hoots in hell about anything but a Nightmare VAT (or Nightmare Flat) tax that is only a vague theoretical dream??? Let's see your plan in intimate detail otherwise it will be apparent to anyone with a shred of smarts that you really ARE a phony and a fraud trying by nefarious means to defend the SQL notions.
"Most, PROBABLY having nothing to do with taxes ..."???I haven't sat down and counted them, so I don't know for sure. Have you counted them? [Actually, they don't even release their reports to the public, although members of Congress might.]
You don't know I see but post blithely away nevertheless. Their workload would be drastically cut since much of what they do is tax related in one way or another. Study some of their papers sometimes if you can find any that are not biased to the Status Quo - that's where they live and put bread on the table now.I really doubt their workload would go down. This is a sampling of reports from May. Out of the 120+ it appears two have to do with taxes.