Great news, certainly! If only the shafting could be more severe...
Doesn't the absurdity of that register to you at all.
But I don't regard it as absurd. I think it's a correct decision by a just court.
It's exactly like accidentally backing over someone's garbage can and having to pay $25,000 in damages.
You equate the cat with an inanimate object, a position consistent with your previous posts. I non-concur. So did the court.
Gratuitous high five implemented.
I can only assume that you are a twisted PETA type person.
"Gratuitous high five implemented."
Are you sure you want to applaude the elevation of animals as more than property? How does it feel to nail the planks into PETA's platform?