[neutrino]

Good! And I hope she pursues aggressive collection procedures, including (but not limited to) ex parte' garnishment of bank accounts, seizure of real property, and (my personal favorite) getting a court order to enter the debtor's house with a sheriff's deputy to inventory non-exempt property.

The nice thing about garnishment of people's bank accounts is that the bank tacks on a service charge of about $400 per garnishment. Yes, it comes out of the debtor's account and is not counted as part of the satisfaction of the judgment.

Make the debtor's life pure, unmitigated Hell.

[John O]

the cat was property and the owner should be reimbursed the exact amount she had it insured for up to $500. (as no cat is worth more than that)

Judgements like this are what lead to little old ladies houses being burned down. After all if the innocent dog owner (he didn't kill the cat after all) has his life ruined for a minor animal control violation he may as well take someone down with him.

I mean it's not like he shot the property.

[DLfromthedesert]

And if she tries to enter his house, I hope he uses his second amendment rights. This woman and judge are wackos.