Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Let’s Make It An Amicable Split When Quebec Finally Separates
Columnist Section ^ | May 8, 2005 | Paul Jackson

Posted on 05/08/2005 8:34:07 AM PDT by UpHereEh

I’ve written that, before any couple starts to plan a honeymoon vacation to Europe, they should visit Quebec.

That goes for a lot of other would-be world travellers, too.

In Quebec, we have what amounts to a foreign country—a slab of continental Europe—right on our doorstep.

Quebec City is the most historic and beautiful capital in our country, the Gaspe is marvelous, and the Laurentians magnificent.

Yet, since the currency is the same no one will gyp you, drinking the tap water won’t make you sick, and if they can, and many can’t, Quebecers will speak to you in your own language.

I’ve spent a lot of happy times in Quebec, especially in old Montreal, and it’s all rather enchanting.

Setting the scene for this column in this way will, I hope, prevent anyone from labelling me anti-French Canadian or anti-Quebec.

After all, the Jean Chretien/Paul Martin Liberals are ever eager to hurl slurs at people. Particularly so when it comes to Quebec, which is a charade, since those of us with an ounce of common sense now know the sudden surge of separatist fever in la belle province has been spurred by the Chretien/Martin clique itself, and by the shameless looting of the taxpayers’ money as evidence by revelations coming out of Mr. Justice John Gomery’s inquiry.

(Excerpt) Read more at proudtobecanadian.ca ...


TOPICS: Canada; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 05/08/2005 8:34:07 AM PDT by UpHereEh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: UpHereEh

Paul Jacson`s an idiot.

You never reward the one who initiates the divorce.They`re the one who gets punished.

The xenophobes aka quebecers will never get northern Quebec,the natives won`t have any of that.The xenophobes won`t get the St.Lawrence seaway either.Canada and the USA won`t allow that.

So what`s left.A sliver of a country running along side the St.Lawrence and the gaspe coast.

Good riddance to these xenphobic racists. Visit Quebec ! ? Only if you like being treated like pond scum.This Orwellian place is spooky,with language police shasing people around if the english letters on a a store owners sign is too large.


2 posted on 05/08/2005 8:43:51 AM PDT by Para-Ord.45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45


*Jackson

*chasing


3 posted on 05/08/2005 8:45:03 AM PDT by Para-Ord.45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: UpHereEh

Let Quebec go. Canada will be better off without it.


4 posted on 05/08/2005 8:49:18 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UpHereEh
Quebec is full of frogs. Why the heck would I want to go there?

I snicker at frogs. I don't rub elbows with them.

5 posted on 05/08/2005 8:53:11 AM PDT by LibKill (Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

I don't think there will be much left of Canada following the next election. Quebec and Alberta will both separate and I'm sure others will consider following.


6 posted on 05/08/2005 8:53:45 AM PDT by UpHereEh (Standing with the U.S.Eh!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: UpHereEh; Tijeras_Slim
Feh.

If I want to experience Yurp, I'll just go to Epcot.

7 posted on 05/08/2005 8:54:03 AM PDT by martin_fierro (King o' the Thread Bomb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UpHereEh

It will be interesting to see if an independent Quebec is bound by the terms of NAFTA. My guess is that it isn't, although they may choose to ratify and become a party to it.


8 posted on 05/08/2005 8:55:16 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UpHereEh; All

I forsee Albera joining us...


9 posted on 05/08/2005 8:55:40 AM PDT by KevinDavis (Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: UpHereEh
Seriously? Alberta, too?
10 posted on 05/08/2005 8:57:15 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: UpHereEh

When the southern states tried to secede from the United States in 1861, the U.S. government sent in its troops to stop them. When and if Quebec tries to secede, the Canadian government will send in its Liberals to stop them.


11 posted on 05/08/2005 8:58:02 AM PDT by CivilWarguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: UpHereEh


Alberta could petition Congress to become a State.The atlantic provinces would be better off becoming a territory,like Gaum or Puerto Rico.

Canada would consist of Ontario,Saskachewan,Manitoba,Newfoundland,British Columbia,Yukon,NWT,Nunavut,and parts of Qubec that would join Ontario.


12 posted on 05/08/2005 9:03:16 AM PDT by Para-Ord.45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: UpHereEh
Quebec has no intention of separating from Canada. They've been playing this little game for the last 35 years in which they threaten to separate, hold a referendum for secession that is defeated by a narrow margin, and then use that "close call" referendum to extract more and more concessions from Ottawa in the form of government handouts, special laws for Quebec, etc.

If Quebec ever held a referendum like this and it PASSED, the "separatists" would be so alarmed over losing their Federal cash cow that they'd demand ongoing recounts until the referendum was defeated.

13 posted on 05/08/2005 9:03:41 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but lord I'm free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
I don't know if the US should entertain admission of Canadian provinces as states even if they desire it.

Probably the nastiest congressional battles in US history involved the admission of new states and how it would change the political nature of the country. It wasn't just a slave state/free state thing, although that was a major factor.

The Democrats would certainly block admission of an Alberta unless it was offset by a couple of gay marriage, socialized medicine, America-hating provinces.

14 posted on 05/08/2005 9:06:53 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarguy
Correction, the Southern States DID secede from the US.
15 posted on 05/08/2005 9:08:21 AM PDT by aspiring.hillbilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: aspiring.hillbilly
And were then conquered in the War of Norther Aggression.
16 posted on 05/08/2005 9:13:42 AM PDT by SubMareener (Become a monthly donor! Free FreeRepublic.com from Quarterly FReepathons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45

actually it is a control thing. The one who initiates the divorce is essentially claiming control. This forces the other party to react and "deal with it".

Essentially this author is saying Quebec wants a no fault divorce with custody of the hydroelectric dams paid for by the Canadian Federal Government.

If Quebec goes the damns should stay.


17 posted on 05/08/2005 9:16:09 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: UpHereEh
For, without Quebec, and the huge continuing expense to taxpayers in the rest of the nation of bribing it to remain, our federal coffers would be overflowing and we’d soon wipe out the entire $500 billion debt, which would be a tremendous boost to our economy.

English Canada would need some 25% fewer federal government employees, there would be no more need to continue to pay hundreds of millions of dollars into sinkholes like Bombardier, the headquarters of Air Canada, plus a stack of federal government agencies now located in Quebec, could be relocated.

That Hull, the other half of the so-called national capital region, would be a ghost town of empty buildings which would be the Quebec government’s problem.

Just as Europe, with a notable exception being Britain, has the common currency of the Euro, Quebec would be free to still use the Canadian dollar, but with no input into what the Bank of Canada does, or opt for the U.S. dollar.

Quebecers would not be able to have Canadian passports, or any other attributes of Canada.

Why would they, though?



I support allowing alberta to decide if they want to join the USA.

http://www.unitednorthamerica.org
18 posted on 05/08/2005 9:32:23 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

For sure, Alberta will go before Quebec.


19 posted on 05/08/2005 9:32:29 AM PDT by UpHereEh (Standing with the U.S.Eh!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarguy

There already have at a cost of $425 million to the Canadian taxpayers ($100 million of which went into liberal pockets)


20 posted on 05/08/2005 9:33:38 AM PDT by UpHereEh (Standing with the U.S.Eh!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson