Yawn.
Do you have anything specific to say, or are we going to leave it at "BLARGH HUAGH MODERN SCIENCE IS JUST PHILOSOPHY AND I HAVE MEMORIZED MY THESAURUS"
Not at this time. Certainly not to your satisfaction.
My point is that the word "scientist" is used too loosely in the article above. One does not need a thesaurus to understand and point out the difference between reasonable conjecture and undeniable fact. Those who are incapable of making this distinction should divest themselves of the name "scientist." If not, we should do it for them.