I've already answered you "one man" problem in another thread.
DNA analysis --- consistent with evolution --- has proven that there is at least one shared common male ancestor --- and one shared female ancestor, for that matter.
So that objection is bogus, and you know it.
I guess the folks on THIS thread, who weren't on the OTHER thread would like to hear it.
DNA analysis --- consistent with evolution --- has proven that there is at least one shared common male ancestor --- and one shared female ancestor, for that matter.
Even I'D like to see this!