[doc30]

Absolutely. As a professional, I have the right to accept or refuse a client for whatever freakin' reason I want. The fact that I am licensed by a state board doesn't give anyone the right to tell me that I must work for any and all prospective clients. Why is it such a big deal for people to accept the notion that a pharmacist should be no different than an engineer, lawyer, accountant, etc. in this regard?

Does this apply to firefighters or police officers? If a firefighter finds gambling immoral and a casino was on fire, should he have the right to refuse to put it out? I think one crux of theissue is whether you are self employed or if you are working for a company. The employer can mandate you fill the perscription, even if you find it immoral. The employer has the option of terminating your employment by your refusal to perform your job.

[Alberta's Child]

You're right on all counts. I should have been more clear in my posts -- I'm specifically referring to a self-employed pharmacist, not an employee who refuses to do his job for some "moral concerns" over one of his job tasks.