Posted on 05/03/2005 5:33:17 AM PDT by wallcrawlr
All these questions could be asked and answered at the time the doctor prescribes the medication. When a person needs drugs that are prescribed by a licensed doctor I'd guess they could care less if they receive it from a nameless government functionary or a machine. They just want what is legally their right to have without another man's judgement attached.
If I own a gun store and someone comes in to buy a gun, it's really none of my business what he/she wants to use it for. But if someone comes in to buy a gun and tells me that they are going out to kill their spouse, children, elected leaders, etc., then I'm going to tell that person to take a f#%&ing walk.
I don't know why this is such a big deal. A person who runs a private company can accept or refuse a client for any damn reason he wants -- or for no damn reason at all.
The doctors are prescribing the medicine. Why would you want to cut them out? The disconnect comes when their patients cannot receive the prescribed medicine. That's the part that can be replaced.
Must every pharmacist in existence make himself a party to this suicide in order to satisfy you? Is there no allowance for conscience?
Would you sell a gun to a suicidal man? Even if it's legal?
SD
The pharmacist is not a useless tool in the process of obtaining medication, BTW. One key role of a pharmacist is to make sure a patient doesn't have any potential side effects to a medication due to allergies, other concurrent medications, etc.
Exactly.
Who cares about the persons name and who says they would be unqualified? They'd more than likely be more qualified than the current pharmacists because they could specialize in the products sold by their particular company. That way the company could screen out any person who does not agree to dispense their products. I see this as a win-win situation. The patients get their prescribed medicine without having to play morality bingo, not knowing which pharmacist on which shift at which store has a problem with which prescription. While the pharmacists could chose to work only for the companies whose drugs do not violate their moral integrity.
This whole thing is nonsense... the number of pharmacies refusing birth control is inately miniscule.... face it... when's the last time you walked into one that didn't have condoms?
I hardly doubt you are finding a rash of women who can't get their pills... but of course the media's going to make it seem like that.
Right, but that doesn't seem to be the case. And it's a different question entirely.
Which, IMO, would be your right. If you did sell contraception, it would also be your right to fire a pharmacist employee who refused to fill such prescriptions.
No government involvement required, in either case.
"Should a pharmacist's moral views trump a woman's reproductive rights?"
How about:
"Should a woman's reproductive choices trump a pharmacist's moral views."
By the way, this issue is far less about "the pill" and far more about an impending battle over "the morning after pill."
There's a tremendous difference between birth control and post conception abortion by pill. The abortion crowd is already putting the spin on this to have legislation passed that makes it illegal for a pharmacist to refuse to sell "the morning after pill."
How many pharmacist know a persons mental state when they fill a prescription? I've never been asked by a pharmacist if I were suicidal or even if I was having a bad day when I've had narcotic prescriptions filled. All they wanted was my insurance and deductible.
That's between you and your employer. It's none of the government's business.
But Planned Barrenhood would like the government to do the equivalent of forcing businesses to sell liquor, cigaretts, and nudie magazines. It's not really about "choice". It's about power.
Should a woman's "reproductive rights," which exist not in the Constitution but only in the fevered mind of judicial tyrants, trump a health care worker's God-given right not to be forced to participate in the destruction of innocent human life?
AMA VOTES AGAINST LETTING WOMEN KNOW "THE PILL" IS ABORTIFACIENT
Postfertilization (early abortion) Effect of Hormonal Emergency Contraception
You are being pinged because you previously requested to be added to my personal "orthodox Catholics" ping list. If you would like to be added or removed, please send me a FReepmail.
All of which could be asked over the phone when the prescription arrives in the mail. Most drug stores have this service now.
Also, the idea that anyone has a right to the labor of another is tantamount to an endorsement of slavery.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.