Citation: Misrepresenting story - Inaccurate TitleHow about an 'indictment in the court of pubic opinion'; you plead; I sentence; you perform some helpful public service and additionally you promise never to repeat said infraction again?You are issuing a "citation"? How droll. -- You gots to show me you badges first..
I think it's just a bit more than disingenuous to 'plant' such a misleading title only to stir up the passions of others in an intentionally false and misleading manner.
Just to clarify, what exactly was it the ATF did 'again'?
It's not very clear in my mind, and it's probably ambiguous by what exactly is meant by that to more than just a few others reading these threads ...
Citation: Misrepresenting story - Inaccurate Title
You are issuing a "citation"? How droll. -- You gots to show me you badges first..
How about an 'indictment in the court of pubic opinion'; you plead; I sentence; you perform some helpful public service and additionally you promise never to repeat said infraction again?
How bout I laugh a lot at your imagined power trip?
I think it's just a bit more than disingenuous to 'plant' such a misleading title only to stir up the passions of others in an intentionally false and misleading manner.
Get a grip _jimmy.. That hype don't hunt.
Just to clarify, what exactly was it the ATF did 'again'?
The ATF routinely abuses the power [that Congress unconstitutionally gave them] to 'regulate' firearms. Try reading the 2nd Amendment for original intent sometime _jim.. Our right to bear arms is being infringed, quite obviously.
It's not very clear in my mind, and it's probably ambiguous by what exactly is meant by that to more than just a few others reading these threads ...
I just addressed the fact that there are quite a few freepers like you around here. Thanks for admitting it.
They turned in a federally licensed dealer, with an import license, a "regular" federal firearms license, and a Class III dealer's license (license to sell, and thus buy from suppliers, machine guns) to state authorities, in violation of federal law. This where there was no violation of federal laws or regulations that the BATFE is supposed to be enforcing.
So yes indeed, they are "at it again" or more properly "still at it".
While I agree that the title failed to fully address the nature of the case, or article, The ATF did break federal law by sharing the info.