Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Orlando Bloom Crusades in 'Kingdom of Heaven'
Hollywood Confidential ^ | April 30th, 2005

Posted on 04/29/2005 1:00:01 PM PDT by missyme

We recently attended a preview of director Ridley Scott's crusader epic, "Kingdom of Heaven," which opens nationally May 6. The $130 million film -- which stars Orlando Bloom, Liam Neeson and Jeremy Irons -- tells the story of a 12th century blacksmith who rises to defend Jerusalem from Muslim invaders.

We're unable to officially review the film until its release, but we had these observations:

Although Scott put "Kingdom" in development before the 9/11 attacks, it's obvious that the War on Terror forms the backdrop for the film. "Kingdom of Heaven" is clearly intended to be a parable for our time, and it's therefore disappointing that a director of Scott's skill and experience (directing classics like "Alien," "Blade Runner" and "Gladiator") would opt for such a conventional, secular-liberal interpretation of the present conflict.

Even with its gorgeous settings, splendid action sequences, and some fine performances by Neeson and Irons, "Kingdom of Heaven" wears its politics too much on its sleeve.

The Western crusaders are too often dismissed as bloodthirsty and rapacious, and religion itself (both Christianity and Islam) is reduced to little more than a source of fanaticism. Scott doesn't glamorize the Islamic cause -- yet he can't understand it, either. Neither side's worldview is explored in any depth, because Scott assumes that war is the natural outflow of religion -- any religion.

Liberal Hollywood is struggling to find its voice in the post-9/11 world. Ridley Scott's effort may be the most ambitious yet in this regard, but the limitations of the liberal wordview in understanding our current struggle are become more obvious by the day. Aesthetically, "Kingdom of Heaven" may be a huge leap forward from "Fahrenheit 9/11," but its values are only baby steps removed.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: kingdomofheaven; moviereview
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-238 last
To: Borges

Which is why some people take issue with the values represented in art.


221 posted on 04/29/2005 3:50:00 PM PDT by stands2reason (It's 2005, and two wrongs still don't make a right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: thombo

Since this thread has been primarily about the Crusades and the moral issues therein with regards to various faiths what I said was not the 'playing of a card' but a related addition to an ongoing discussion.


222 posted on 04/29/2005 4:10:52 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason

The way to respond is to create your own Art. Why be surprised that somebody else's reflects their values? It's always been that way. And Postmodernism has produced terrific American work (Pynchon, Delillo...Tarantino)


223 posted on 04/29/2005 4:13:41 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq

"a lot of things happened back then that Christians today would think barbaric..."Good point,and let's not forget that a lot of the Middle East(imho)is still in that barbaric state.


224 posted on 04/29/2005 4:16:04 PM PDT by thombo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq

"a lot of things happened back then that Christians today would think barbaric..."Good point,and let's not forget that a lot of the Middle East(imho)is still(culturaly)in that barbaric state thanks to Islam.


225 posted on 04/29/2005 4:18:20 PM PDT by thombo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Borges
Is that a quote from Anna?

Well, it appears to have been scanned in ("ivho"... for "who"). No mention of the actual author. (Are we to assume the poster wrote this? Not likely considering diction and style).

226 posted on 04/29/2005 4:21:43 PM PDT by nonsporting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: thombo

The Muslims are offended because Bush used the word Crusade? Funny I hear the word Jihad coming out of Muslim countries almost daily.


227 posted on 04/29/2005 4:24:40 PM PDT by Americanexpat (A strong democracy through citizen oversight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Thankyou for the clarrification.


228 posted on 04/29/2005 4:26:09 PM PDT by thombo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: nonsporting

It was sourced later in this thread.


229 posted on 04/29/2005 4:27:51 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: Borges
"Barbara Streisand has opened her alligator-sized mouth wide before her humming-bird brain has had a chance to catch up," ranted R. Lee Ermey.

I love Ermey!!

230 posted on 04/29/2005 4:27:56 PM PDT by TightyRighty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: Americanexpat
"The Muslims are offended because Bush used the word Crusade? Funny I hear the word Jihad coming out of Muslim countries almost daily."

Thank You!

231 posted on 04/29/2005 4:28:42 PM PDT by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: Americanexpat

"Muslims are offended because Bush used the word Crusade?"Maybe this whole thing in the ME is(in a way)a continuation of the Crusades.Jihad is directed against the West,and as far as i'm concerned that includes Christianity and Judaism."The more things change,the more they remain the same"I can't recall who wrote that,but i think it's appropriate.


232 posted on 04/29/2005 4:37:36 PM PDT by thombo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: American Quilter
You're welcome. It's such a complex subject, and one of the most fascinating events in human history.

I've never seen a newspaper article do it justice.

233 posted on 04/29/2005 6:38:58 PM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: LiveBait
Roman Catholocism DID have a monopoly on Christianity in Western Europe

I wasn't thinking of just Western Europe.

A schism developed a few years before the first crusade: the church was divided between West and East, between Rome and Constantinople.

However I can't find where I read about Rome's desire to control the Holy Land to demonstrate that Rome's was the true religion, as being a cause of the Crusade.

Perhaps I was wrong, or perhaps I got the cause of the Crusades mixed up with some other conflict.

234 posted on 04/29/2005 8:23:32 PM PDT by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Dares of Phrygia

I don't think rapaciousness had as much to do with being Christian as it had with being Norman and landless.


235 posted on 04/29/2005 8:55:18 PM PDT by virgil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Age of Reason

You may have been right, I just had never really come across that as a motivation.


236 posted on 04/30/2005 9:00:43 AM PDT by LiveBait
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: Dares of Phrygia
CHRISTIANS HAVE DONE BAD THINGS!!

Of course they have.

a certain Volkmar, of whose origins we know nothing

Indeed. Volkmar was neither authorized nor sent by the Christian community and represented Christianity in no way. Volkmar represented Volkmar.

Ignoring the special orders of the emperor Henry, [Emich] persuaded his followers to begin their Crusade on 3 May with an attack on the Jewish community at Spier

Again, Emich was not authorized by the Church. The emperor, who represented Christians as a political community, had forbidden his crimes - and Emich disobeyed.

the [local] bishop intervened and opened his palace to jewish refugees. But Emich and the angry crowds with him forced the gates and broke into the sanctuary. There, despite the bishop's protests, they slaughtered all his guests, to the number of about 500

In other words, the official representative of the Christian community did his utmost to defend the Jews from these barbarians.

Basically you are trying to pin these atrocities on "Christianity" when they were perpetrated by people who rejected the commands of the prince to whom, as Christians, they owed their obedience and who rejected the teaching of their bishop who was the local leader of the Christian Church.

Blaming this tuff on Christianity is like blaming the OKC bombing on America.

237 posted on 04/30/2005 11:09:51 AM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: ReeseKev27
The film "We Were Soldiers" was a great movie that portrayed a very bloody battle in Vietnam.


238 posted on 04/30/2005 11:34:09 AM PDT by 2nd_Amendment_Defender ("It is when people forget God that tyrants forge their chains." -- Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-238 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson