[Lunatic Fringe]

Misleading headline- he was arrested for trespassing.

[ArrogantBustard]

Misleading headline- he was arrested for trespassing.

He was arrested for the high crime of Contempt for the Almighty Master of the Peoples' Glorious Democratic Public School System.

'Trespassing' was just the excuse.

[Mrs.Nooseman]

during a scheduled meeting with the principal

I fail to see how it was trespassing if he had a scheduled meeting on public property! Seems to me that he was arrested under false charges!

I however would have left with my child after being asked to leave!

I guess parents rights are getting more and more ignored in todays age!

[mlc9852]

He was arrested to get rid of him. Since when doesn't a parent with a child in school have a right to be at that school? Gosh, I hope they find a really good lawyer. By the way, where is the ACLU on this? This makes me so very angry!

[Sirc_Valence]

No, you are misleading
if this story is true. I can't believe that it is. I don't see the reason that anyone would have provoked the man this way if he was at a meeting. Kicking him out would have been wrong for the reasons given. The father was arrested when a lib principal refused the father's request not to have his son perverted by a government oligarchy. What in the hell are these people doing? You don't mess with someone's children, and it is wreckless and irresponsible to allow any government officials to keep their jobs after doing so. Trust me, if I was in his shoes, I wouldn't just be arrested for trespassing.