*sigh*
Perhaps you've never encountered the concept of illustrating absurdity by being absurd? In which case your failure to recognise how that first line of my response was quite deliberately designed as a point of connection to, and mockery of the general attitude of baseless bravado and denial is quite par for the course.
Makes it rather clear who can recognise a joke and who cannot. Freepmails from others laughing at that exact line showed me they understood it exactly in the context I intended. I'm sorry if it was over your head and behind a curtain, scarecrow.
My point? Resident in the repeated and unsupported claims that there is little or nothing to fear from the Islamic religion being practiced unhindered in America as it is written in the Qur'an, is a more dangerous risk than is violating the civil rights of a small percentage of the reported 6.5 million muslims who live here.
Not all of them are here legally, nor are they all American citizens, or even resident aliens, and those who are not should not expect to be afforded the rights and protections of citizenship.
Yes, some were born here and converted to Islam, but I feel it not unreasonable to be concerned about them as well (Jose Padilla, John Walker Lindh...) since I reside in the city that was home to the "Portland Seven" gang of idiots.
It is a good thing that you are laughing - on any pretext - since laughter is good medicine.
A.A.C.
"Perhaps you've never encountered the concept of illustrating absurdity by being absurd? "
OH - NOW I get it... all this time you have been illustrating the absurdity of people who engage in simple dialoge by writing 1000 word essays, expecting people to hang on their every word and not need any source material for things in contention that they present as fact.
All this time you have simply been illustrating how absurd someone who WOULD use the phrase "You seriously underestimate who you're dealing with in me, obsequious twit." is.
You're a regular Al Franken aren't you ? Ha Ha ha