"Perhaps you've never encountered the concept of illustrating absurdity by being absurd? "
OH - NOW I get it... all this time you have been illustrating the absurdity of people who engage in simple dialoge by writing 1000 word essays, expecting people to hang on their every word and not need any source material for things in contention that they present as fact.
All this time you have simply been illustrating how absurd someone who WOULD use the phrase "You seriously underestimate who you're dealing with in me, obsequious twit." is.
You're a regular Al Franken aren't you ? Ha Ha ha
>"You're a regular Al Franken aren't you ?"<
To be precise: no.
>"expecting people to hang on their every word and not need any source material for things in contention that they present as fact."<
Now that would be a pretty low set of expectations indeed.
Since you are apparently reluctant to accept:
1) innumerable historical instances of violence and war committed by thoroughly mainstream muslims,
2) innumerable historical examples of the duplicity of muslims who effected conquest by deceit, initially flying a flag of peaceful coexistence and tolerance of other religions/cultures only to rip away the masque and prosecute war against the infidels with a savage vengeance,
3) innumerable verifiable verses cited from the Qur'an, which make crystal-clear alla-uzza's unwillingness to tolerate another religion or god than himself, or allow any of his believers to so tolerate in their proximity (when they can effect any change)
4) a plenitude of citations of other holy script and Sharia law widely accepted by (minimally) a simple majority of mainstream muslims which affirm, support, or augment the intolerant proscriptions of the Qur'an.
5) Islam's longstanding historical record of Qur'an-based oppression, disregard for, and disenfranchisement of women
as factual source material...
There's really no reasoning with you.
You're a regular Henri-Phillippe Petain, aren't you?
Ha ha ha
A.A.C.