"SEE # 96."
SEE # 96. Run
Run #96. Run
( You might not get this, it's from just about every Americans first reader, take my word for it, you'ld be rolling on the floor )
"Without a study of the ahadith, it is impossible to have an accurate understanding of Islam and its laws."
Since the earliest collection of hadiths dates from 1.5 to 2 centuries after Muhammad's death, and since the Koran specifically states "[6:115] The word of your Lord is complete, in truth and justice " ANY dependance on the hadiths as a source of truth or law is suspect.
As a historian, sure, study every facet ... you might even be the one to figure out how they get sucked into the perversion and find a solution.
I suspect though it is much like the church before printing, the leaders were the one who held the books and control - none of the flock was about to argue with them.
I'm an Aussie. Care to explain 96? It means nothing to me.
OK, so now I have the message. Islam THINKS the hadith, the sayings and doings of mohammad have meaning, but you know different.
Care to share that information with the clerics? And while you are at it, how about you tell them that all the nice 'verses' in the koran are fine, but the later, nasty ones, which abrogate the nice ones, have to be disregarded, removed, stripped out of the koran. OUT! FINITO! NO MORE!
I want to see the 'kill the jews hiding behind rocks' removed, get it? And that business about kuffar being filthy dirty etc, I want that out. All of it. Just the nice bits remain, and we all get along. Off you go, you have work to do.
"Run #96. Run "
ROTFLMHO! You're right!
Actually, the same thought went through my mind. AIEEEE Dick and Jane and Spot brainwashing!