You said "scientific proof"?
Interesting you left this part out:
In this report, the committee incorporated new epidemiological evidence from the U.S., Denmark, Sweden, and the United Kingdom, and studies of biologic mechanisms related to vaccines and autism since its report in 2001.
That's an awful lot of studies and co-conspirators. Are all these countries in this together?
In a word, pretty much. They all are true believers in the fact that if this scandal reached acceptance proportions that Mass Immunization would be threatened.
However, Going further, do you mean to say that the fact that they are relying on Epidemiolgical studies, when we already know that it is restricted to a population subset, (thereby rendering epidemiolgical methodology inaccurate) doesn't tell you something.
This is a case for Lab work, not Statistics.
I left nothing out. I translated the intent.
That's an awful lot of studies and co-conspirators. Are all these countries in this together?
It sure is. It's also a LOT of money and liability if people don't stick together.
Who's talking about countries? I said nothing about countries. I've been talking about coalitions of drug companies and the medical community. And, yes, I believe it's a gigantic CYA conspiracy.
...and, no, I refuse to put on my tinfoil hat.
;-)
Gee, that would be a real stretch.