Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rmlew
Those ships, although the newest for their respective countries, are still not topping Arleigh Burke (DDG-51). For one, they are all fleet defense ships (AAW, ASUW, ASW) with no ability to strike inland (Tomahawk).

They're trying to do what DDG-51 does (especially that Chinese DDG-51 lookalike) in sensors and combat systems, but they're not AEGIS.

We're thinking ahead of DDG-51, but we're trying to do too much all at once and it's pricey.

Now take our DDG-51 and put a new 100 mile gun on her. Or install a new radar and NTDS. Or develop a new hull with new electric propulsion then fit her with current weapons and sensors.
56 posted on 04/20/2005 3:38:52 AM PDT by ryan71 (Speak softly and carry a BIG STICK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: ryan71
Those ships, although the newest for their respective countries, are still not topping Arleigh Burke (DDG-51). For one, they are all fleet defense ships (AAW, ASUW, ASW) with no ability to strike inland (Tomahawk).
A few of there have Mk 41 VLS tubes and could use the Tomahawk, if we sold it to them. The Russian SS-n-27 might also work.
60 posted on 04/23/2005 12:17:32 AM PDT by rmlew (Copperheads and Peaceniks beware! Sedition is a crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson