Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/18/2005 4:41:09 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Behind Liberal Lines; Miss Marple; an amused spectator; netmilsmom; Diogenesis; YaYa123; MEG33; ...

Today Show ping.


2 posted on 04/18/2005 4:41:34 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest (Watching the Today Show since 2002 so you don't have to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Tomorrow, Katie will be asking whether the Pope actually has to be a Catholic? Isn't it unfair to require this? Isn't the Vatican a state? What about the separation between church and state? Can't Bill Clinton be Pope?


3 posted on 04/18/2005 4:45:22 AM PDT by RobFromGa (Enact Constitutional Option Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Why would anybody bother doing a poll of American Catholics? It is not like the Cardinals are electing an American Pope. In an age where Catholicism is growing by leaps and bounds in Africa and Latin America, and there are a Billion people in China who desperately need to hear the Truth, the concerns of American Catholics seem fairly insignificant in the great scheme of things.


6 posted on 04/18/2005 4:52:13 AM PDT by gridlock (ELIMINATE PERVERSE INCENTIVES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
What does it say about the Democrats when their lead man on ethics is someone who was reprimanded for letting a prostitution ring be run out of his home and who fixed tickets for his prostitute lover?

To any decent party, and to any decent constituents, Barney Frank (Old Marble Mouth)would be an embarassment that would be quickly removed from office. Since he's a Dem from Massachusetts, though, there is literally nothing he could do or say to get removed.

7 posted on 04/18/2005 4:52:50 AM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
How can democrats talk about ethics when they don't know even know what it means?

And I just don't know about these polls that 80% want the Pope to let up on some of the conservative stuff. Isn't the Pope supposed to be following what the Bible says? How could one Pope see things one way and then another one comes in and translates a different way? That's like dems and repubs. It probably shows that I'm not Catholic so maybe I don't understand.

8 posted on 04/18/2005 4:54:03 AM PDT by queenkathy (A day without sunshine is like, well, night)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
What does it say about the Democrats when their lead man on ethics is someone who was reprimanded for letting a prostitution ring be run out of his home and who fixed tickets for his prostitute lover?

Thank for the uber-liberal MSM update.

Maybe congress can get back to work this week without the Deaniacks at the DNC shooting blanks.

Thanks for your report. Where and how did you learn to write so well?

10 posted on 04/18/2005 5:04:41 AM PDT by Major_Risktaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Katie won't be happy unless Desmond Tutu gets the nod.
(Conveniently forgetting, of course, that he was responsible for *converting* his country (South Africa) to 3rd world status).


11 posted on 04/18/2005 5:05:12 AM PDT by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Poor Katy....she's only going to be happy if someone like Michael Moore Moron becomes Pope.
15 posted on 04/18/2005 5:16:19 AM PDT by Pillows
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Color me naive, but for the life of me I'll never understand why Couric gets paid big bucks for her "talent".


16 posted on 04/18/2005 5:18:01 AM PDT by Carolinamom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Someone should tell Katie that the term "Third World" is out of date. Beyond that, I hope she gets her wish. These African cardinals are among the most conservative, a complication she seemingly hasn't grasped.


17 posted on 04/18/2005 5:18:33 AM PDT by joylyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
And of course, when it comes to Today, FReepers in droves don't bother to tune in!

Thanks to YOUR briefing governleastgovernsbest. Great writing. Your briefing and FReeper comments/links are infinitely more interesting than the scam of TODAY

21 posted on 04/18/2005 5:47:31 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Today next aired a clip of uber-liberal Massachusetts Congressman Barney Frank [presumably from his Meet the Press appearance] who opined that Delay is accused not merely of peccadilloes, but of "serious ethics charges."

I'd like to order Chinese food for the Perky One, Matt Lauer and Barney Frank. Barney would get a double portion of Sum-Yung-Guy and Katie and Matt could watch Barney eat himself to death.

41 posted on 04/18/2005 7:54:14 AM PDT by hflynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Bump, I wonder if Katie has already picked out a nice black outfit for tomorrow's show. Maybe she will get teary eyed like after the last Presidential election.


43 posted on 04/19/2005 2:01:22 PM PDT by TBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Have a look at Brent Bozell's take, that just appeared today, on The Today Show's coverage of Delay that I reported on days ago in this thread, and see if you don't think he might be lurking here for inspiration!

You'll note he picks up the same items appearing in my report about "storm clouds," the irony of using Barney Frank as an "ethics" spokesman, and the fact that the Dems made serious-sounding noises while avoiding any specific allegations.

Hey Brent, you're welcome to lurk, but how about a citation!



Tom DeLay vs. media lite
Brent Bozell


April 21, 2005

For years now, liberals have snidely suggested that watching Fox News Channel makes dumb conservatives even dumber. They've even produced trumped-up studies trying to prove it. This is in marked contrast to the enlightened viewers of the fusty old news networks, the ones upholding the standards of seriously weighty journalism, you see.

How vague and uninformative can these tired Old Media types be? Take the issue of House Majority Leader Tom DeLay. From the vantage point of these news networks, it's unimportant to debate the substance of liberal attacks on DeLay. The charges don't even have to be explained. No, the only thing that's important is to build a vague impression of staggering momentum: DeLay has to go. On Monday morning, April 18, CBS and NBC morning shows picked up the story. Let's look at the basic elements used to sing the "Hallelujah, Republicans in Trouble" chorus:

1. Set a dark and spooky tone. NBC's Matt Lauer introduced the story: "Storm clouds are gathering on Capitol Hill, and at the center of the storm is the House Majority Leader, Texas Congressman Tom DeLay." Lauer overlooked the [natty] point: It is the media themselves who are taping the dark clouds into the metaphorical sky and then "reporting" on that storm. CBS's Julie Chen armed herself with other cliches: "Under fire for possible ethics violations," DeLay went to Houston "for some much needed support."

2. Empower the protesters. Then came the chants and obligatory signs of the left-wing DeLay-haters standing outside the NRA convention in Houston as DeLay spoke. Some signs read "Un-American Radical," and "Indict Delay now," and mocking DeLay's old exterminating business, "The Constitution is not a cockroach." Why does this little crowd outside, estimated by reporters as at best 150 people, suddenly get anointed as the voice of the people, while thousands cheering DeLay inside are ignored? Because they help the networks build their DeLay-the-crook storyline. CBS added the ridiculous line that some people in the protesters claimed to be conservative Republicans. Yes, and I suppose Dan Rather is a conservative Republican, too.

3. Run the clip of DeLay making a gun joke at the NRA convention. DeLay cracked: "When a man's in trouble or in a good fight, you want all your friends around them, preferably armed." It's fair to wonder if the networks aired this because they thought this joke was sick, not funny. From his Sunday perch on "Face the Nation," CBS anchor Bob Schieffer demanded that Rep. David Dreier denounce the line as "inflammatory" and asked him to disassociate himself "from these kinds of remarks." Should Schieffer disassociate himself from CBS's Julie Chen reporting DeLay was "under fire," too?

4. Run outraged soundbite from a Democrat denouncing DeLay and ignore that Democrat's documented unethical behavior. In NBC's case, we were treated to Rep. Barney Frank disparaging DeLay: "We're not talking about peccadilloes here. We're talking about a serious corruption of the public policy process." NBC knows Barney Frank didn't care about corruption when the Clintons were in power, and NBC knows Barney Frank is a rich pick to accuse DeLay of corruption, given the revelation in August 1989 that Barney Frank had a male lover running a male prostitution ring out of his house -- which NBC thought merited some 30 seconds of anchor dismissal at the time.

5. Speculate like crazy, for the Death Watch is on. NBC highlighted how "some Republicans" are wondering if DeLay is harming the party, and maybe he'll have a tougher re-election fight. This isn't the reporting of today's news. It's an attempt to influence the next day's news. On this count, at least CBS noted that even Democrats assume he's not going anywhere soon. But too much political news is trying to set the stage for what's next, and too little is based on what's already established.

What was missing in these "storm cloud" reports was any substance, not even much of a description of what the charges entailed. CBS only cited "three congressional rebukes for alleged ethical lapses ... amid reports he took luxury trips set up by big money lobbyists." NBC said, "DeLay is under scrutiny for his political fundraising, for his overseas trips and for his connections to lobbyists under federal investigation. All that comes on top of three admonishments by the House Ethics committee last year."

Are those few seconds really offering enough -- for that matter, any information? Does it really explain what happened before the Ethics Committee? Why not compare the charges against DeLay to what Democrats do? Or to what Bill Clinton did to please donors, foreign and domestic? In the final analysis, TV news looks shallow and uninformative. Maybe it's because it's the only way to keep the storm brewing.

Brent Bozell is President of Media Research Center, a Townhall.com member group.

©2005 Creators Syndicate, Inc.


45 posted on 04/21/2005 7:20:53 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest (Watching the Today Show since 2002 so you don't have to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson