Replies

In early 1994 Theresa contracted a urinary tract infection and Michael, in consultation with Theresa's treating physician, elected not to treat the infection

That is not what Michael's testimony of the Dep. of Michael Schiavo --Nov. 19, 1993 said.

I can look it up on my other computer tomorrow if you would like me to. Since she is dead, I have no overwhelming urge to do that at the moment.

Glad to see you are starting to look into this btw.

I have already looked into it for the past three weeks and made my decision. Based on the Constitution, and not conspiracy theories from Pinellas County. Oh wait, here's part of the deposition from 1993 right here...

Q. So when you made the decision on your own not to teat or instructed the doctor not to treat Terri’s infection – her bladder infection, no physician had made the statements that Dr. Harrison had to you at that time, did they? (Objections by Mr. Nilsson)
Q. Prior to your making – you know, the decision we’re talking about, the decision that you made to treat your wife’s bladder infection – had any physician ever suggested to you that if she has an infection in the future that you don’t treat it or that you allow her to die?
SCHIAVO: Well, I went and talked to Dr. Mulroy about it.
Q. And what was Dr. Mulroy’s advice to you, if any?
SCHIAVO: Not to treat the infection.

Now what did you say again?

I know Mike tried to let her die of an UTI in 1993 against doctors orders

Well apparently not...

All of them can be found HERE. And do you know in every instance that I can see he relied on the doctor's decision?

BTW, here's a bit from his statements in 2000

Q. Are you aware of any treatment anywhere that can help Terri?
SCHIAVO: There is no treatment anywhere that can help Terri. No.
Q. If there were, what would you do?
SCHIAVO: I would be there in a heartbeat.

But let's throw him under the bus on some more baseless allegations shall we?