Replies

Hon. Buy a clue. I've offered more court links to this matter than Carter has little pills.

If you don't like what the under oath testimony says, take it up with the doctors.

And I guess you didn't know that under oath the Schindlers admitted they were upset they didn't get any of the malpractice money?

And under oath the Schindlers admitted that up until the malpractice money was given to Michael, they thought he was a fantastic son in law.

And under oath the Schindlers admitted they advised Michael it was time to get a life and get a girlfriend and they wanted to meet the future girlfriends and remain close.

And under oath the Schindlers admitted they knew Terri as PVS.

But ignore the under oath stuff from little people like doctors who actually treated her.

And believe instead the gossip and unsourced crap on the internet. People who we don't even know are real doctors. It's so much more titillating and fun, right?

Hey Peach, I'm just now reading Wolfson's report that you referenced. Are you deliberately ignoring Pearse's sworn testimony about Michael's hearsay testimony that Terri didn't want to remain in a vegetative state, and that he was "...necessarily adversely affected by the obvious financial benefit to him of being the sole heir at law..." and "...specifically referencing Michael's change in position relative to maintaining Theresa following the malpractice award."

This is in the body of the report that you posted as the primary source of your position. Do you believe the sworn testimony of the Guardian Ad Litem, Pearse, when he recommended that the feeding tube be kept in place, or are you being deliberately disingenuous?!?!

You're all over the map here.