Hey Peach, I'm just now reading Wolfson's report that you referenced. Are you deliberately ignoring Pearse's sworn testimony about Michael's hearsay testimony that Terri didn't want to remain in a vegetative state, and that he was "...necessarily adversely affected by the obvious financial benefit to him of being the sole heir at law..." and "...specifically referencing Michael's change in position relative to maintaining Theresa following the malpractice award."
This is in the body of the report that you posted as the primary source of your position. Do you believe the sworn testimony of the Guardian Ad Litem, Pearse, when he recommended that the feeding tube be kept in place, or are you being deliberately disingenuous?!?!
You're all over the map here.
I read that and know what you are referring to.
I also read the parts in the WOlfson report that you are ignoring.
That MS provided excellent care for Terri. So good that nurses were intimidated by him because he was so demanding.
I read that report over a month ago but believe it's Wolfson's report that also references the gruesome testimony of the parents that even if Terri woke up and said that she didn't want to be kept alive, they would keep her alive. They also testified to this under oath.
They also testified that if she needed multiple amputations because of poor circulation and diabetes, they would keep her alive.
It was also the Wolfson report, wasn't it? that mentioned that MS offered to give up any future benefit from money left in Terri's court controlled account from the malpractice suit. An offer the Schindlers never took up because it wouldn't give them the conspiracy theory that he was just wanting her dead for money.
It was either the Wolfson report or the 2002 court testimony.