[Torie]

I don't think you read my post very closely. I think legislatures should make laws, not the judiciary.

[risk]

Is it always OK for legislators to make laws that violate natural law? Here in California, where we have repeatedly said by ballot that we reject legal changes to our fundamental views of marriage, what do you say about judge Richard Kramer's San Francisco Superior Court ruling in March 2005 that our laws barring the redefinition of marriage is "unconstitutional?"

When something this basic to the laws of nature becomes just another debate for the our legislatures and our law benches, there can only be more trouble on the horizon. And again, for what? A rubber stamp?