Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Torie
Is it always OK for legislators to make laws that violate natural law? Here in California, where we have repeatedly said by ballot that we reject legal changes to our fundamental views of marriage, what do you say about judge Richard Kramer's San Francisco Superior Court ruling in March 2005 that our laws barring the redefinition of marriage is "unconstitutional?"

When something this basic to the laws of nature becomes just another debate for the our legislatures and our law benches, there can only be more trouble on the horizon. And again, for what? A rubber stamp?

675 posted on 04/24/2005 5:51:14 PM PDT by risk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 666 | View Replies ]


To: risk
Is it always OK for legislators to make laws that violate natural law?

Since I think natural law is a figment of your imagination, absolutely. What I do favor, is folks agitating in the public square, for what they in good conscience, think is right. That is what I favor, and in general, without interference from the robes. Have I made that clear yet?

681 posted on 04/24/2005 5:57:27 PM PDT by Torie (Constrain rogue state courts; repeal your state constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 675 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson