Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blueriver
"So did he put DNR on her then because it was her wish or not?"

On the advice of her doctor.

"Read it for yourself."

I did. The law simply put in writing the court decision arrived at back in 1990 in the Browning case.

156 posted on 04/19/2005 8:37:28 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen
On the advice of her doctor.

So it had nothing to do with Terris wish to not live this way. Ok I am going to give you that one because you know I think you are right for once. I don't think Mike ever took any of the steps he took to end Terris life based on a recolection of her wish to die. I think he made that all up - because well lets face it she wasn't dying on her own accord.

159 posted on 04/19/2005 9:39:32 AM PDT by blueriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]

To: robertpaulsen
The law simply put in writing the court decision arrived at back in 1990 in the Browning case.

Browning, of Dunedin, had written a living will in 1985, saying she did not want to be kept alive by artificial means if she ever became ill.

Big difference.

160 posted on 04/19/2005 9:48:22 AM PDT by blueriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson