Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Save the battlewagons
townhall.com ^ | April 15,2005 | Oliver North

Posted on 04/15/2005 2:27:55 AM PDT by Zero Sum

"There is no weapon system in the world that comes even close to the visible symbol of enormous power represented by the battleship." -- Retired Gen. P.X. Kelly, USMC

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Those words of the former Marine commandant resonate with me. In 1969, gunfire from the battleship USS New Jersey (BB-62) saved my rifle platoon in Vietnam. During her six months in-theater, the USS New Jersey's 16-inch guns were credited with saving more than 1,000 Marines' lives. The North Vietnamese so feared the ship that they cited her as a roadblock to the Paris peace talks. Our leaders, as they did so often in that war, made the wrong choice and sent her home. Now, 36 years later, Washington is poised to make another battleship blunder.

(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: battleships; battlewagon; cnim; ergm; olivernorth; usn; ussiowa; usswisconsin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 321-340 next last
To: Experiment 6-2-6

They have speed as well---all the IOWA's exceeded 35 knots in service.


181 posted on 04/15/2005 8:36:18 AM PDT by swordfish71 (PRAYERS for TEXAS COWBOY!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
This century's major wars will be won or lost from hardened underground control centers in the heart of America, using unmanned aircraft and space-based technologies

And while they a searching for a target worthy of the technolocal sophistication, platoon sized units armed with assault rifles are going to nove in and take possesion of the territory.

182 posted on 04/15/2005 8:36:23 AM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Laws are for the guidence of wise men and the blind obedience of fools - Solon, Lawmaker of Athens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Wombat101

Yeah. And your point is???

;^P


183 posted on 04/15/2005 8:36:35 AM PDT by null and void (RFID - It's all in the wrist™...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Wombat101

Village People ping! "In the Navy you can live a life of ease...."


184 posted on 04/15/2005 8:37:20 AM PDT by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Jimmy Valentine

See post #126 on the Alaskas. They mounted 12" very similar to the Scharnhorst and Gneisnau.


185 posted on 04/15/2005 8:38:05 AM PDT by DarthVader (Liberal Democrat = Fat, drunk and stupid is a hell of a way to go through life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: Zero Sum
"There is no weapon system in the world that comes even close to the visible symbol of enormous power represented by the battleship." -- Retired Gen. P.X. Kelly, USMC

I nominate the aircraft carrier. (How old is this quote?)

186 posted on 04/15/2005 8:38:35 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

The ultimate "No Trespassing" device.


187 posted on 04/15/2005 8:39:26 AM PDT by DarthVader (Liberal Democrat = Fat, drunk and stupid is a hell of a way to go through life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Fine. WHile you're busy programming your autonoumous robots to be autonomous, my old-fashioned, gun-armed, real-flesh-and-blood military will occupy your land and steal your riches. Afterwards, we'll reinstate commerce.

Youwould have failed because you cannot program a computer for every contingency and my human generals would have run tactical rings around your robots utilizing their Mark I, standard-issue brains.


188 posted on 04/15/2005 8:40:00 AM PDT by Wombat101 (Sanitized for YOUR protection....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Wombat101

Alaska and Guam were pretty ships though


189 posted on 04/15/2005 8:40:03 AM PDT by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Wombat101

rue

190 posted on 04/15/2005 8:40:22 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Time Ebbs No Rankle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Zero Sum

If I had the money, I'd by a battleship and a carrier and convert them (modernized upgrades) to keep the shipyards in tune with new technology, to give the US Navy some advanced ideas, and just to have some fun gosh darn it.


192 posted on 04/15/2005 8:41:30 AM PDT by SaltyJoe (Forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swordfish71

They all were reported to reach 37-38 knots when recommissioned in the 80's except Missouri who experienced severe vibration from a bent keel which she suffered when she grounded in Puget Sound in 1950. She could still do her WWII best of 34 knots.


193 posted on 04/15/2005 8:42:35 AM PDT by DarthVader (Liberal Democrat = Fat, drunk and stupid is a hell of a way to go through life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: Zero Sum
Our current SoD reminds me of another whiz kid of years ago. As an long inactive Marine trained in Naval Gun Fire, I can tell you that nothing, gets the job done like a Iowa class battleship, nothing. Nothing projects power like an Iowa class battleship. Why our leaders want to retire the best firepower platform the world has ever seen is a complete mystery. I think they a flat out crazy or worse, treasonous.

An armed forces lead by Rumfield is just like the smaller, faster, cheaper NASA that can't do big missions any longer. Is that what we want? A military that can hide real good, but can't fight? Is that what Rummy is trying to build? Sure looks like it.

194 posted on 04/15/2005 8:42:47 AM PDT by jpsb (I already know I am a terrible speller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wombat101
As a computer programmer (automation programming, no less) I can tell you that the day will never come when machines comepletely replace human beings ni any endeavor. After all, who prorgrams and builds the machines?

Non sequitur.

The only thing that humans do currently that current computers generally do not (or do worse) with the software we write is algorithmic induction. That is it, and that won't be true for long. It is not that computers cannot do it, but it is a difficult and relatively obscure theoretical engineering problem that was poorly understood until relatively recently. And humans are not particularly good at this either, though it is the specific ability that allows us to design machines and software even with our limited competence. Go ahead and look it up; very few programmers even know what algorithmic induction is even though it is the theoretical elephant in the room of software engineering and computer science.

When computer software starts implementing pervasive algorithmic induction, the human brain will be on the fast track to obsolescence.

195 posted on 04/15/2005 8:42:49 AM PDT by tortoise (All these moments lost in time, like tears in the rain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: DarthVader
I stand corrected, you are right sir!

How's about we re-activate the Demoines and the Salem? Automatic 8 inch guns and thirty three knots! Gorgeous ships too!

Regards,

196 posted on 04/15/2005 8:42:50 AM PDT by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

197 posted on 04/15/2005 8:42:57 AM PDT by null and void (RFID - It's all in the wrist™...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Wombat101

>>Comparing the Yamato to the Iowas is a BAD way to try and make your point.

No, it isn't.

The point is that these ships were quite vulnerable to 40s-era aviation technology. I grant all your points; minor quibbles over relative technical minutia don't change the vulnerability of tube-based naval firepower, compared to the standoff capability of a carrier.

If you want to spend a carrier's worth of cash, spend it on a carrier, not a romantic hull from a bygone age.


198 posted on 04/15/2005 8:43:03 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Official Ruling Class Oligarch Oppressor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Jimmy Valentine

That would be a good idea plus add heavy missile armament.


199 posted on 04/15/2005 8:45:00 AM PDT by DarthVader (Liberal Democrat = Fat, drunk and stupid is a hell of a way to go through life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
"Bismarck"

Lucky shot, also any Iowa class battleship would blow Bismarck and her sister ship out of the water in short order. Iowa class battleships saw lot's of action in WW2 and not one was ever seriously damaged.

200 posted on 04/15/2005 8:46:31 AM PDT by jpsb (I already know I am a terrible speller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 321-340 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson