Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SDUT: Who's to blame for high gas prices?
San Diego Union-Tribune ^ | April 11, 2005 | Brian P. Simpson

Posted on 04/11/2005 5:58:56 PM PDT by OESY

Gas prices are at record highs again. Many think oil companies are to blame. In fact, a May 2004 poll showed that 77 percent of Californians believed this to be true. However, this just shows the media have failed to properly inform people about who's causing high gas prices.

One thing is certain: oil companies are not to blame for high gas prices. These companies are responsible for producing the gasoline we need. In California, where gas prices are among the nation's highest, the oil industry has been repeatedly investigated to find evidence of "price manipulation" and none has ever been found.

Although there are other causes of high gas prices, such as high gasoline taxes, the primary cause is environmental regulation. For example, environmental regulation has significantly restricted drilling for oil in Alaska and on the continental shelf. More drilling will increase the gasoline supply (up to 10 percent from greater Alaskan drilling alone) and thus lower prices.

Further, there are currently 18 different gasoline formulations in use across the United States, making it much more costly to produce and distribute gasoline. These blends aren't needed due to requirements of automobile engines, nor are they required by oil companies. The blends, including different ones used at different times of the year and in different geographic areas, are forced on Americans by environmental regulations. Among other things, the regulations force refiners to incur greater costs in switching from the production of one blend to another. They also force refiners to produce a more costly "summer blend," which is partially responsible for the current rise in price.

The situation is worst in California, where environmental regulations are strictest. For example, California was one of only three states to require the removal of the octane booster MTBE in January 2004. This reduced the gasoline supply by almost 10 percent.

Using corn-based ethanol as a replacement doesn't help much since California's strict emissions regulations require the removal of almost the equivalent in other gasoline components to accommodate ethanol. Ethanol alos must be shipped from the Midwest in trucks since it cannot be produced in refineries and doesn't travel well through pipelines. As a result, gasoline prices were predicted to increase 35 to 40 cents. Given that the average price in 2004 was almost 30 cents higher than in 2003, these predictions weren't too far off.

Additionally, the California government forced gasoline stations to install double-walled underground tanks, which forced many stations to rip perfectly good single-walled tanks out of the ground. It also imposes the harshest emissions requirements in the country, which makes necessary the use of a more costly, special blend of gasoline not produced anywhere but in California. It's no accident that gas in California is generally 30 to 40 cents above the national average.

From drilling to refining to distribution, environmentalists have done everything they can to raise the price of gasoline.

The above raises a question: Why do environmental regulations exist?

One might think they exist to protect consumers, but the evidence doesn't show this. For instance, MTBE was banned based on claims that it causes cancer. However, it has never been shown to be a danger to humans in the amounts to which they might be exposed. Claims that it "causes cancer" are based on experiments in which mice were fed doses almost 70,000 times larger than to what humans might be exposed. No scientist worthy of the title would make claims based on that kind of extrapolation.

Environmentalists are not actually concerned with the well-being of man. Their real motive is to sacrifice man to nature by stopping industrial activity. This is what they explicitly state. For instance, Adam Kolton of the Alaska Wilderness League states, "Drilling the wildest place in America is objectionable no matter how it's packaged." David M. Graber, a research biologist with the National Park Service, states, "We are not interested in the utility of a particular species, or free-flowing river, or ecosystem, to mankind. They have ... more value – to me – than another human body, or a billion of them."

Oil companies deserve to be praised for producing an abundance of gasoline despite the massive burden of environmental regulations foisted upon them. To increase the gasoline supply further, we need to start by eliminating these regulations. If the government makes the choice to protect people's freedom, gasoline below a dollar-per-gallon won't be just a relic of the past.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: anwr; energy; energyprices; environment; gasoline; gasprices; mtbe; oil; refineries
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last
To: stboz

Yes siree! Count on anyone dealing with the United States to be fair and honest when selling us oil!


21 posted on 04/11/2005 6:22:24 PM PDT by Enterprise (Abortion and "euthanasia" - the twin destroyers of the Democrat Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree
Maybe someone can tell me why diesel, the cheapest fuel to refine, is the most expensive at the pump.

It's kinda like Bill Clinton's confessions. "I did it just because I could." (And ...just maybe, there's a heckuva lot of demand for diesel.)

22 posted on 04/11/2005 6:28:36 PM PDT by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: OESY
California was one of only three states to require the removal of the octane booster MTBE in January 2004. This reduced the gasoline supply by almost 10 percent.

That's a bogus conclusion because the reduction in mileage from adding MTBE equals or exceeds that of the volume made up by adding it...

23 posted on 04/11/2005 6:28:57 PM PDT by Axenolith (The 23rd Century will be here sooner than you think...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend; OESY

...ping.


24 posted on 04/11/2005 6:30:18 PM PDT by Seadog Bytes (“The people never give up their liberties but under some delusion.”—Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne

"The reason, the ONLY reason, for the gasoline prices today is the bleeping regulatory EPA and the bleeping evironazis.

Bleep them all, bleep it!"

Uh....no. It's a little more complicated than that.


25 posted on 04/11/2005 6:33:22 PM PDT by Ragnarok105
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: OESY
MTBE was banned based on claims that it causes cancer.

And because it's water soluble, was hell on older car fuel systems, has a miniscule (~15-35 ppb) odor threshold in water. It's just all around crap, and it was foisted upon the public with great assistance from refiners...

26 posted on 04/11/2005 6:34:48 PM PDT by Axenolith (The 23rd Century will be here sooner than you think...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: willstayfree
One gets the impression that the increases are helping to pay for the war since there is a very large amount of tax in gas prices.

Someone will correct me if I am wrong, but I believe that most gasoline taxes are not based on a percentage of the price per gallon but on a certain number of cents per gallon. So they don't increase when the price of a gallon of gas increases.

27 posted on 04/11/2005 6:35:17 PM PDT by John Thornton ("Appeasers always hope that the crocodile will eat them last." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: OESY
California's strict emissions regulations require the removal of almost the equivalent in other gasoline components to accommodate ethanol.

Well duh! If you're adding X% of something to a total, you've got to remove or displace X% of other components...

28 posted on 04/11/2005 6:37:36 PM PDT by Axenolith (The 23rd Century will be here sooner than you think...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

ayn rand had the left figured out in the 1960s.

look at her book "the new left: the anti-technological revolution". must read.


29 posted on 04/11/2005 6:37:50 PM PDT by ken21 (if you didn't see it on tv, then it didn't happen. /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: henderson field; Flavius; okie01
RE: "... the government blew up the economy in 1929. That's what happens when socialists meddle with capitalism."

I always liked this quote...

"A free-market society runs pretty much on auto-pilot.   It may get boring for those who want to muck with the controls, but that doesn't mean we should let them." -- Jonah Goldberg, NRO Editor


30 posted on 04/11/2005 6:39:12 PM PDT by Seadog Bytes (“The people never give up their liberties but under some delusion.”—Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

environmental cost and all makes gas way too high no arguement there, but what about frickin iraq shouldn't we be swimming in oil by now?

now before everyone bites my head off i voted for bush and support him on most but fill'n up my truck is cost'n me big time now! bush was an oilman wasn't he?, what's he waitin for? his national energy policy is doin nothin and i hold him accountable for these prices. say what you will.


31 posted on 04/11/2005 6:39:19 PM PDT by crab-boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

Let me be the first to tell you...........

EXCELLENT POST!


32 posted on 04/11/2005 6:39:41 PM PDT by Prolifeconservative (If there is another terrorist attack, the womb is a very unsafe place to hide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree
Maybe someone can tell me why diesel, the cheapest fuel to refine, is the most expensive at the pump.

Could have something to do with economies of scale in retailing and distribution. Or because the market will bear it.

33 posted on 04/11/2005 6:39:44 PM PDT by TN4Liberty (American... conservative... southern.... It doesn't get any better than this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dufekin
The oil companies aren't poor, innocent victims of high oil prices. They simply pass their costs to the consumers, the ultimate (and often poor) victims of regulatory costs and excessive taxation.

I'm not so sure, I heat my home with oil. In a little less then a month my price for heating oil went from $1.89 to $2.04 per gal. The product that I buy is dyed #2 Diesel fuel, non taxable for off road use only. The I-94 price for Diesel is $2.279/gal which includes a Wisconsin $0.315/gal excise tax and a Fed $0.244/gal bite. So the same gallon of motor fuel w/o the road tax should cost no more than say $1.72. My question, who is getting the other $0.32/gal which amounts to about $80.00 a fill every month.

By the way, Wisconsin currently has the highest fuel excise tax in the nation. Thought you might like to know.

Regards,
GtG

34 posted on 04/11/2005 6:41:42 PM PDT by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, but I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: I got the rope
I want to know when we are going to build at least one new refinery.

You do understand, oh simple one, that the price of oil has nothing to do with refining capacity?

35 posted on 04/11/2005 6:43:28 PM PDT by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: crab-boy
Welcome to Free Republic. Your first post blames Bush for high energy costs. Nice! Should be interesting to hear when you have some logic to back it up except "bush is an oil man."

You people are so transparent.

36 posted on 04/11/2005 6:43:34 PM PDT by TN4Liberty (American... conservative... southern.... It doesn't get any better than this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: willstayfree
Bush is very silent about the astronomical increase in oil prices over the past year. One gets the impression that the increases are helping to pay for the war since there is a very large amount of tax in gas prices.

The taxes are fixed, regardless of the price of gasoline. They don't go up when the price of gasoline goes up.

I'm curious whether you're ignorant of this fact, or just a stupid troll.

37 posted on 04/11/2005 6:48:22 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: OESY

Why would an administration composed of oilmen possibly want to lower gas prices and oil company profits?


38 posted on 04/11/2005 6:48:23 PM PDT by paleocon patriarch ("Never attribute to a conspiracy that which can be explained by incompetence.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Thornton

In California there is a cents-per-gallon gas tax (~$0.18 if I remember coorrectly) AND sales tax which can be as high as 8.5%. The losers are actually trying to propose an additional $0.10 tax while hoping the rubes don't figure out they already got nearly all of it with the price increases of the last ~2 years...


39 posted on 04/11/2005 6:48:55 PM PDT by Axenolith (The 23rd Century will be here sooner than you think...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Java Guy

f.y.i.


40 posted on 04/11/2005 6:53:19 PM PDT by tame (Frist and Cheney are WRONG--Tom Delay is RIGHT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson