Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fred Nerks

I also don't remember them using the term "COMPLETELY WITHOUT"

I do remember them saying that she received fluids on Fri for a short time-- I also note that they did refuse her eyedrops for her eyes! While hse has Glaucoma-- (CRUEL)

AND I note that Kenneth specifically told me that the LaGrange News article was GOOD ON THE FACTS and that article covered her measely ice chips and pudding...\

but- if you have to mis quote to hold onto your "beliefs" NOT MY ISSUE!


86 posted on 04/10/2005 9:33:14 PM PDT by eeevil conservative (Don't Change Minds, Change Lives! Sherri Reese)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]


To: eeevil conservative

psssst...don't think you meant that one for me?


90 posted on 04/10/2005 9:39:13 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Proud to be an Aussie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

To: eeevil conservative
but- if you have to mis quote to hold onto your "beliefs" NOT MY ISSUE!

What part of denied don't you understand? He didn't say reduced hydration or partial hydration. He said nourishment and fluids are being denied. The following statement was reported well after the April 4th hearing where an agreement was reached. Mullinax is pulling your chain.

But her health becomes more precarious by the hour. Her vital signs are still good, but since admission to hospice she has not been lucid – "but who would be since nourishment and fluids have been denied since March 28," Mullinax remarked.

101 posted on 04/10/2005 9:56:03 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson