Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court tosses conviction of man who endorsed Bush's death
Associated Press via MercuryNews ^ | Fri, Apr. 08, 2005 | DAVID KRAVETS

Posted on 04/08/2005 4:27:51 PM PDT by mdittmar

Mailing a letter to the White House supporting President Bush's death at the hands of terrorists is not illegal, a federal appeals court ruled Friday.

The decision overturns the conviction and 18-month sentence given last year to an Oregon inmate who sent a rambling, poorly written letter to the president. It read, in part, "You will die too George W Bush real Soon they Promised That you would Long Live Bin Laden."

(Excerpt) Read more at mercurynews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 9thcircus; aclulist; bushdoctrineunfold; courtofapeals; deaththreat; firstamendment; freespeech; govwatch; michaelmoore; robedtyrants; ruling; wardchurchill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-158 next last
To: cripplecreek
I wonder what would happen if a similarly-written letter were sent to the 9th circus judges, about the 9th circus judges.

Hmmm...

61 posted on 04/08/2005 6:31:39 PM PDT by AmishDude (Join the AmishDude fan club: "You're a luminary!" -- Howlin; "You are a wise man." -- Torie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

Sure sounds illegal to me.

I know one fella who was once at the Federal prison at Jesup GA who was there precisely for mailing threatening letters to W's daddy.


62 posted on 04/08/2005 6:34:21 PM PDT by wardaddy ("Finally!, A Man Worth Killing!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine

These are the same guys who said the website showing abortionists still in practice, or who died, or who had retired was, in fact, a threat!


63 posted on 04/08/2005 6:39:10 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

The snippet of the article doesn't say, but I don't think it would be going out on a limb to assume the appeals court in question is the 9th Circuit...


64 posted on 04/08/2005 6:49:39 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph
The same letter to Lord High Chief Justice Greer would land one in the slammer for life.

If I remember correctly, someone has already been charged with threatening Greer and Shiavo.

Becki

65 posted on 04/08/2005 6:51:32 PM PDT by Becki (There is hope for me. Even Moses was a basket case.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph
The same letter to Lord High Chief Justice Greer would land one in the slammer for life.

...WITHOUT food and water.

66 posted on 04/08/2005 6:55:06 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (“I am happy, be it yourselves as well.”...Pope John Paul II, March, 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

Or to bill clinton.


67 posted on 04/08/2005 6:56:34 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
what exactly does the LAW say ?

Article 218: Section 5, Paragraph 2:

You threatened a Republican President, therefore its ok. Just dont do this to a Democrat President.

68 posted on 04/08/2005 7:03:24 PM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

This nut didn't personally threaten Bush's life, from what I read. He said that Bush would die because the terrorists promised it. Perhaps he's a cagey nut. He writes like he went my high school. If he did go to my high school he's been punished enough.


69 posted on 04/08/2005 7:13:40 PM PDT by yooper (If you don't know where you're going, any road will take you there......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: oolatec; All
How times haven't changed,

Robert M. La Follette, Jr., U.S. senator of Wisconsin,Offers his support for Roosevelt's(D)"court-packing" proposal.

On February 13, 1937,liberal Republican Senator Robert M. La Follette, Jr. spoke out in support of President Franklin Roosevelt's controversial plan to neutralize Supreme Court justices who were hostile to the New Deal. Over the previous two years, the high court had struck down several key pieces of New Deal legislation on the grounds that the laws delegated an unconstitutional amount of authority to the executive branch and the federal government. Flushed with his landslide re-election in 1936, President Roosevelt issued a proposal in February 1937 to provide retirement at full pay for all members of the court over seventy. If a justice refused to retire, an "assistant" with full voting rights was to be appointed, thus ensuring Roosevelt a liberal majority. Most Republicans and many Democrats in Congress opposed the so-called "court-packing" plan.

"Our constitution is what the justices choose to make it." (February 13, 1937)

They packed the courts with libs back then.

70 posted on 04/08/2005 7:14:44 PM PDT by mdittmar (May God watch over those who serve,and have served, to keep us free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: This Just In
"After two secret servicemen payed his friend a personal visit, the joke was no longer funny. The student never did that again."

When I was in college at MTU, a guy who was butt-wasted at the bar took a dare and threatened Reagan from the pay phone outside. He lasted less than two weeks, and the judge didn't have a sense of humor.

Same school several years later (I was working on my MSCE); the secret service shows up and collars a kid for e-mailing a death threat to Clinton. Turns out the kid got up and left his work station without signing off of his account. He went through hell before he was let go, and the slime that sat down at his terminal and sent the message was never caught.

Lesson? Don't fork with the president, no matter who the president is. And always log off.

71 posted on 04/08/2005 7:21:39 PM PDT by yooper (If you don't know where you're going, any road will take you there......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: yooper

"Don't fork with the president....."

Unfortunately that inmate did, and the "judge" sided in this criminal's favor.


72 posted on 04/08/2005 7:36:35 PM PDT by This Just In ((In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Becki

That's what I was going to post also. The FBI has arrested a woman for saying she was going to kill MS but someone can threaten our president and it's ok? oh my!


73 posted on 04/08/2005 8:02:52 PM PDT by queenkathy (Can't think of anything cute for my tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

Mathew Hale got 40 years in the slammer. And he didn't do anything to any judge. He didn't directly threaten any judge from what I understand. I want court reform


74 posted on 04/08/2005 8:10:50 PM PDT by virgil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: virgil
I want court reform

You and me both but thats will not happen until we get a conservative president and conservatives in the majority of the house and senate. imdoing all i can to make sure that happens by voting straight libertarian ticket from now on just like i did in 2002 and 2004

75 posted on 04/08/2005 8:19:37 PM PDT by freepatriot32 (If you want to change goverment support the libertarian party www.lp.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph
The same letter to Lord High Chief Justice Greer would land one in the slammer for life.

I'm telling ya, YOU are SO RIGHT. We are one messed up society!!!!!!!!

76 posted on 04/08/2005 8:42:13 PM PDT by pollywog (Psalm 121;1 I Lift my eyes to the hills from whence cometh my help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph
9th Circus?

Yes. Unanimous 3-clown panel

Can anyone here see the need for JUDICIAL OVERHAUL?!!!!!!!!!!!!!

77 posted on 04/08/2005 8:43:49 PM PDT by pollywog (Psalm 121;1 I Lift my eyes to the hills from whence cometh my help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
I assume this guy will be forever watched by the secret service and with a little luck he'll step over the line and get himself into real trouble that he can't weasel out of.

Is this guy already in prison? Is he in there for this threat or did he write the letter from prison?

Journalism degree....pfttt!

78 posted on 04/08/2005 9:39:34 PM PDT by hattend (Liberals! Beware the Perfect Rovian Storm [All Hail the Evil War Monkey King, Chimpus Khan!])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
It's been a pretty long time since that was important.

Tragically true.

79 posted on 04/08/2005 9:41:09 PM PDT by zip (Remember: DimocRat lies told often enough became truth to 48% of Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: infidel29

yep, the circle where traitors go, sounds about right. Threatening the president, or encouraging those that do sounds treasonous to me.


80 posted on 04/08/2005 10:22:10 PM PDT by Celtic Rose (It may be prudent in me to act sometimes by other men's reason, but I can think only by my own)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-158 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson