Actually, upon further review, I believe I was incorrect about the headline. I think WND is referring to the few hours WND reports a feeding tube was in on April 1st before the granddaughter sought and gained emergency guardianship before the probate court judge. I had missed the report that the feeding tube was in for a few hours then. I had thought only IV fluids were started.
It's all a minor point anyway about the tube being pulled or denied, anyway. All the same. If that's all people can complain about, then WND would be far beyond any other news source. FReegards....