Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Clint N. Suhks

That's about cross-dressing. Close, but not quite.


95 posted on 04/07/2005 8:00:23 AM PDT by thoughtomator ("The Passion of the Opus" - 2 hours of a FReeper being crucified on his own self-pitying thread)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]


To: thoughtomator
That's about cross-dressing. Close, but not quite.

So cross dressing was wrong but female homosexual behavior was acceptable under the law?

102 posted on 04/07/2005 8:32:18 AM PDT by Jimmyclyde (Dying ain't much of a living boy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

To: thoughtomator

Deut 23:17. Sex outside of marriage is forbidden. So the "there shall be no whores and sodomites..." verse seems to cover it. There is another though. I'm sure I've seen it before.


103 posted on 04/07/2005 8:33:42 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

To: thoughtomator
That's about cross-dressing. Close, but not quite.

Not really, you either misunderstand or are ignoring the nuances and context of Deut. against the subject of homosexuality. So you think Yahweh just had some fashion issues in ancient Israel? You think there were some cross dressing Marlyn Monroe make-up wearing types that needed to be addressed in the Bible?

Disguising or misrepresenting one's gender is a homosexual act in order to attract the opposite sex/gender, you ask your Rabbi if he thinks behaving like the opposite sex in Moses' day isn't specifically for homosexual attraction.

Unless of course you just want to believe the liberal spin for the day, that's your ignorance.

105 posted on 04/07/2005 8:36:03 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks (WARNING: EXPOSURE TO THE SON MAY PREVENT BURNING.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson