Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thoughtomator
That's about cross-dressing. Close, but not quite.

So cross dressing was wrong but female homosexual behavior was acceptable under the law?

102 posted on 04/07/2005 8:32:18 AM PDT by Jimmyclyde (Dying ain't much of a living boy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]


To: Jimmyclyde
So cross dressing was wrong but female homosexual behavior was acceptable under the law?

Moses just didn't like the way lipstick looked on men...it was a big problem back then.

107 posted on 04/07/2005 8:39:04 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks (WARNING: EXPOSURE TO THE SON MAY PREVENT BURNING.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

To: Jimmyclyde

I believe it was considered too trivial to be worth addressing. I can find no law against it... can you?


112 posted on 04/07/2005 8:52:23 AM PDT by thoughtomator ("The Passion of the Opus" - 2 hours of a FReeper being crucified on his own self-pitying thread)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson