Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Spunky
His name was Jay Wolfson (Ph.D), and all he really did was endorse Greer's handling of the case and restate the case for Michael in more academic language. In other words, he just swept it all under the rug -- again -- and by omission, if nothing else, helped send Terri to her death. Michael's supporters like to quote his report.

I can't understand why he didn't review the case de novo and reexamine rulings about which grave doubts have been raised. If nothing else, the disputed rulings are the ones causing the huge public controversy, so those are the ones that most needed to be investigated fairly and put to rest.

120 posted on 04/06/2005 10:12:37 AM PDT by T'wit (Highlights of Euthanasia Movement: Bergen-Belsen, Lubianka, Treblinka, Gulag Archipelago, Auschwitz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]


To: T'wit
"His name was Jay Wolfson (Ph.D), and all he really did was endorse Greer's handling of the case

I read his whole report and yes, you are correct that he was not an advocate for Terri.

I use his quote because he at least states that "The cause of the imbalance was not clearly indentified,....... While no formal proof emerged, the medical records note that the combination of aggressive weight loss, diet control and excessive hydration raised questions about Theresa suffering from Bulimia.."

That's all they did is raise questions. There was no proof that she was Bulemic like everyone likes to say she was.

208 posted on 04/06/2005 5:09:42 PM PDT by Spunky ("Everyone has a freedom of choice, but not of consequences.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson