I can't understand why he didn't review the case de novo and reexamine rulings about which grave doubts have been raised. If nothing else, the disputed rulings are the ones causing the huge public controversy, so those are the ones that most needed to be investigated fairly and put to rest.
I read his whole report and yes, you are correct that he was not an advocate for Terri.
I use his quote because he at least states that "The cause of the imbalance was not clearly indentified,....... While no formal proof emerged, the medical records note that the combination of aggressive weight loss, diet control and excessive hydration raised questions about Theresa suffering from Bulimia.."
That's all they did is raise questions. There was no proof that she was Bulemic like everyone likes to say she was.