Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

British to lead new hunt for bin Laden
The Scotsman ^ | 4/4/05 | Tim Ripley

Posted on 04/04/2005 12:26:29 AM PDT by LibWhacker

Key points
• 5,000 UK troops to leave Iraq for Afghanistan to search for Osama bin Laden
• UK commanders believe Iraqi forces nearly ready to take on security burden
• Scots soldiers expected to spearhead move; forces' composition undecided

BRITAIN is preparing for a major redeployment of troops stationed overseas, withdrawing thousands from Iraq and boosting its military presence in Afghanistan.

Military sources say 5,500 troops will be pulled out of Iraq within the next 12 months, reducing the British presence there by almost two thirds.

Defence sources have told The Scotsman that Britain is preparing to spearhead a new offensive in Afghanistan next year, sending 5,000 troops into the country to lead the hunt for Osama bin Laden and tackle the country’s opium trade.

Military commanders in Iraq believe the campaign there has "turned the corner" and the country’s own security forces are now able to take on a greater burden of the struggle against the insurgency that has gripped Iraq since the United States-led invasion two years ago.

Tony Blair hopes this will allow some 5,500 of the 9,500 strong British garrison in Iraq to be withdrawn by April next year, with the remaining troops being pulled back out of harm’s way to a small number of remote desert bases away from population centres.

Afghanistan is to be the British military’s "main effort" during 2006, according to army officers who say it is hoped that Iraq will have calmed down enough by the spring next year to allow resources to be switched to the new campaign.

The US military has reported a major drop in casualties in Iraq during March with only 33 hostile deaths among coalition forces, but some military sources suggest that the latest outburst of optimism about Iraq may be misplaced and designed to help Labour’s prospects in the coming general election.

Hundreds of Scottish soldiers are expected to spearhead a major deployment of 5,000 British troops to Afghanistan next year in a bid to stabilise once and for all the war ravaged central Asian country.

Some details of the additional troop deployment have already been announced, including the dispatch of the British-led Allied Rapid Reaction Corps (ARRC) headquarters to take over command of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Kabul from May 2006.

For a year some 500 staff officers and other specialist troops of the ARRC will oversee moves to further expand the authority of ISAF throughout rural Afghanistan, clamp down on the country’s illicit heroin harvest and take over part of the hunt for the remnants of Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaeda network from US forces. As the ISAF "lead nation", the UK is expected to provide a significant number of force troops including squadrons of Apache attack and Chinook transport helicopters, logistic troops and medical units.

Military sources also say a large contingent of Special Air Service troops will also be dispatched to reinvigorate the hunt for Osama bin Laden.

The majority of the extra British troops are to be drawn from the elite 16 Air Assault Brigade and the Canterbury-based 1st Battalion, The Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders are to play an important part in new Afghan deployment, according to defence sources.

A Ministry of Defence spokesman told The Scotsman that the exact composition of the force being sent to Afghanistan had not yet been finalised.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; binladen; british; hunt; iraq; manhunt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 04/04/2005 12:26:30 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

OK, sounds good. But from a military pov, they've just tipped their hand.


2 posted on 04/04/2005 12:31:49 AM PDT by ThirstyMan (Why is it, all the dead vote for Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThirstyMan

From OBL's pov, he's in deep shiite.


3 posted on 04/04/2005 12:38:03 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (JPII: "Well done, good and faithful servant!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
A crack team of Aussies, Americans, Brits, Israelis and Gurkhas should be able to find Mr.Bin Laden.

What a collection !
4 posted on 04/04/2005 12:40:17 AM PDT by Red Sea Swimmer (Tisha5765Bav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Sea Swimmer

Don't underestimate the Pashtun's.


5 posted on 04/04/2005 12:50:54 AM PDT by Srirangan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

The Brits are taking over because President Bush dropped the ball and let OBL escape at Tora Bora. That's what John Kerry told me last year. /sarc


6 posted on 04/04/2005 12:55:21 AM PDT by DTogo (U.S. out of the U.N. & U.N out of the U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

I applaud the effort of the Brits, but our own forces should be ashamed if the Brits succeed in bagging bin Laden. Bin Laden attacked the United States, not Great Britain. Vengeance should be ours.


7 posted on 04/04/2005 2:03:05 AM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

Doesn't matter who catches OBL.


8 posted on 04/04/2005 2:17:10 AM PDT by SamAdams76 (Don't You Think This Outlaw Bit's Done Got Out Of Hand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

We should be trying harder than anybody else to get him. If we are, it's not apparent. I hope we are.


9 posted on 04/04/2005 2:19:40 AM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ThirstyMan

How the heck do these stories get out?


10 posted on 04/04/2005 2:23:48 AM PDT by 7.62 x 51mm (• Veni • Vidi • Vino • Visa • "I came, I saw, I drank wine, I shopped")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

British to lead new hunt for bin Laden
in Canada?


11 posted on 04/04/2005 3:50:08 AM PDT by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

There's a method in their madness for telling us this/


12 posted on 04/04/2005 3:58:24 AM PDT by lillybet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lillybet

The method is they have to tell the troops and their families.

I don't see what difference it would make anyway if Bin Laden knows who is coming. His tactics will still be the same.


13 posted on 04/04/2005 4:55:52 AM PDT by cooper72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

There's no way we'ld be able to get OBL if you lot hadn't done most of the heavy lifting. Don't feel bad if we do get him!


14 posted on 04/04/2005 6:06:19 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

All the best to the Brits! They are good troops and can handle this situation.


15 posted on 04/04/2005 6:08:40 AM PDT by rrrod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

Could this be an "April Surprise"? To help Blair's re-election.


16 posted on 04/04/2005 6:10:53 AM PDT by anotherdubya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

Please don't get me wrong...I'd be immensely pleased if you Brits got bin Laden! My only point was that, by rights, it ought to be Americans who get him! That's the way the movies always show it, right?


17 posted on 04/04/2005 6:42:37 AM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored
To tell you the truth, I wouldn't mind at all if it was the Brits that got him. We didn't drag our Allies into this to sit on their hands! We should want our Allies to be fully involved and be active participants in the process. For the Brits to capture OBL would be a huge boost to our friends over there and they could use that to rub in the face of their political opponents.

So I say to them, Happy Hunting!

18 posted on 04/04/2005 8:08:08 AM PDT by SamAdams76 (Don't You Think This Outlaw Bit's Done Got Out Of Hand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

Happiness is the SAS arresting Osama, and them handing him over to American Marines.

Regards, Ivan


19 posted on 04/04/2005 8:12:13 AM PDT by MadIvan (One blog to bring them all...and in the Darkness bind them: http://www.theringwraith.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

No worries, Matt Mihsen is on the job.


20 posted on 04/04/2005 8:18:40 AM PDT by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson