[ClearCase_guy]

Berger wasn't asked to explain why he destroyed three out of the five copies he had stolen.

I guess no one was curious about that point.

[snowman1]

Just a plain old case of COVER YOUR ASS CHARLIE I will lay you odds that there was a lot of hand written stuff on them.

[Paloma_55]

Berger wasn't asked to explain why he destroyed three out of the five copies he had stolen.

I guess no one was curious about that point.

Wow. This is so amazing. It is so "Clintonesque".

If you destroy the evidence, then it is all speculation as to what you did, why you did it, and what may have been covered up.

Rose Law firm records, Etc...

Thing is, you can't really blame the Bush admin on this. Speculation does not win cases. Sure, we can prove he removed documents, but it would be very hard to prove anything other than stupidity. Hard to prove criminal intent if the docs are gone.