Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justice Dept.: Berger Shredding Wasn't Cover-up
NewsMax.com ^ | April 2, 2005 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 04/02/2005 2:27:50 PM PST by rightalien

Former national security advisor Sandy Berger wasn't trying to conceal information when he stuffed five copies of a top secret terrorism report in his pants and socks during two trips to the National Archives in 2003 - before taking the documents home and cutting three of the copies "into small pieces."

That was the claim yestderday of Noel Hillman, chief of the Justice Department's public integrity section, as he tried to explain to Washington, D.C. Magistrate Judge Deborah Robinson why Berger should be let off the hook with a minor fine and no jailtime.

Story Continues Below

Berger "did not have an intent to hide any of the content of the documents," Hillman insisted with a straight face. Instead, he explained, department lawyers concluded that Berger took the documents merely for personal convenience - to prepare for his and President Clinton's testimony before the Sept. 11 Commission - and not to hide any embarrassing evidence, the Washington Post said Saturday.

A report in Friday's New York Times, however, cast substantial doubt on that conclusion.

"In comparing the versions [of the stolen documents] at his office later that day, [Berger] realized that several were essentially the same, and he cut three copies into small pieces," the paper reported, sourcing a Berger "associate."

Aware of the problem, prosecutor Hillman told the judge that the top Clinton official only had copies of the documents - not the originals - and so he was not charged with the more serious crime of destroying documents.

Still, questions remain about whether the copies Berger destroyed had original handwritten notes in the margins - possibly written by other Clinton officials who had reviewed the material when it was first written.

In a brief statement outside the federal courthouse yesterday, Berger said, "I exercised very poor judgment in the course of reviewing documents at the National Archives. I deeply regret it."

But he insisted that his only motivation was to adequately prepare himself and "others" to answer questions from 9/11 probers.

Berger wasn't asked to explain why he destroyed three out of the five copies he had stolen.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: berger; corruption; governmentcorruption; lol; sandyberger; suckers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 last
To: rightalien

The globalist puppet masters have a big club

wellll, both kinds.


61 posted on 04/02/2005 5:58:01 PM PST by Quix (HAVING A FORM of GODLINESS but DENYING ITS POWER. 2 TIM 3:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

If he is dead, he won't need a security clearance.


62 posted on 04/02/2005 6:04:34 PM PST by bert (Peace is only halftime !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ServesURight
Can you believe those four clowns actually ran our country?

Nope.

63 posted on 04/02/2005 6:07:23 PM PST by texasbluebell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

I agree. Beyond puzzling.


64 posted on 04/02/2005 6:07:49 PM PST by Czar (StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rightalien
Former national security advisor Sandy Berger wasn't trying to conceal information when he stuffed five copies of a top secret terrorism report in his pants and socks during two trips to the National Archives in 2003 - before taking the documents home and cutting three of the copies "into small pieces."

What world do these people live in ?

Do they really expect us to believe this BS?

65 posted on 04/02/2005 6:08:46 PM PST by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
There aren't even two parties any more. There's a pro-gun and an anti-gun version of the same party.

Nope.. They're both anti-gun..

One party is "realist" and the other is "idealistic"..

66 posted on 04/02/2005 6:12:05 PM PST by Drammach (Freedom; not just a job, it's an adventure..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: rightalien
Republicans [must be repeated in a hypnotic monotone]: Must fight crime, must be tough on terrorists, must be tough on bad guys.....

...unless they are democrats with political connections! No, we have to show compassion, we have to show restraint, we don't want the Democrats to get maaaaaaaaaad! Goodness, they might say mean things about us, they might fillibuster the President's judicial nominees, they might say bad things about the war in Iraq!....

.......gee, what went wrong? We've been giving them a pass on EVERYTHING since 2001 and they still won't be our friends.

Can't we just AAALLLL get ALOOOOONG?

67 posted on 04/02/2005 6:13:31 PM PST by AnnOutragedCitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert

hmm...now why would we think anything would happen to him?/s


68 posted on 04/02/2005 6:17:19 PM PST by Txsleuth (Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: texasbluebell; maica; Travis McGee
Even if he did need 2 copies for the testimony, why did he destroy the other 3?

embarrassing handwritten notes from several Clinton era operatives?

I am very frustrated at reading the small inside page news articles that all seem to say he took "copies." I don't think he compromised our national security, rather some Clintonistas reputations. Throughout the 8 years, it seemed that the possible penalty for destroying evidence was deemed to be less that the political penalty if the information came out. Another one falls on his sword for the Clintons.

69 posted on 04/02/2005 6:20:31 PM PST by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Mrs Zip

ping


70 posted on 04/02/2005 6:57:15 PM PST by zip (Remember: DimocRat lies told often enough became truth to 48% of Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightalien

You are right to suppose Berger's theft is but a dream. Dear Sandy is living in a fairy tale where there are no consequences for wrong doings. Trouble is, all of us are living in that fairy tale called reality, where people in high places get away with what the common man can't, and it's getting on our last nerves.


71 posted on 04/02/2005 7:05:42 PM PST by demkicker (John McCain is a power hungry traitor and proved it on 2/19/05 in Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell

That is a scream and I agree.


72 posted on 04/02/2005 8:21:19 PM PST by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: cloud8

Very true.


73 posted on 04/02/2005 8:22:07 PM PST by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: rightalien

Uh huh.


74 posted on 04/02/2005 8:22:29 PM PST by The Iguana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightalien

I hope everyone here remembers this (and other) stories, for the next time the picture-licking Bush suckups try to bamboozle everyone into thinking we have some sort of deity as Head Politician.


75 posted on 04/02/2005 9:29:51 PM PST by Hank Rearden (Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
There aren't even two parties any more. There's a pro-gun and an anti-gun version of the same party.

Nope. Not even that. Screw 'em all.

Feinstein Re-Intoduces Federal Assault Weapons Ban (as do [Republicrats] John Warner and Mike DeWine)

76 posted on 04/02/2005 9:35:35 PM PST by Hank Rearden (Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: rightalien

Anyone know what G. Gordan Liddy has to say on this matter?
If Burgler was a republican he would be toast.


77 posted on 04/02/2005 10:15:19 PM PST by Brimack34
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightalien

"Former national security advisor Sandy Berger wasn't trying to conceal information when he stuffed five copies of a top secret terrorism report in his pants and socks during two trips to the National Archives in 2003 - before taking the documents home and cutting three of the copies "into small pieces."

Noel Hillman, of the Justice Department was later heard to say, "Rain is not wet, snow is not white, and the Rockies are not mountains."


78 posted on 04/03/2005 5:04:39 AM PDT by stefeb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson