To: syriacus
Her initial injurty was in 1990. The infamous bone scans were over one year later. How can people connect the two and say that the abuse could have been at Michael Schavio's hand?
Further, why weren't these bone scans introduced into evidence during the malpractice suit?
Why didn't a radiologist see these bone scans prior to the malpractice suit?
The bone scan report, posted on terrisfight.org, makes the report itself potentially biased and inaccurate.
206 posted on
04/02/2005 4:40:35 PM PST by
thinkingman129
(questioning clears the way to understanding.)
To: thinkingman129
why weren't these bone scans introduced into evidence during the malpractice suit? If I remember correctly:
Because Michael and his lawyer didn't want them introduced.
The Schindlers didn't have access to Terri's medical records. Michael would not let them see them.
211 posted on
04/02/2005 5:10:53 PM PST by
syriacus
(Weird George Felos repeatedly flicked his tongue out his gaping mouth when lying to the press 3/31)
To: thinkingman129
The infamous bone scans were over one year later. How can people connect the two and say that the abuse could have been at Michael Schavio's hand? The injuries were at least partly healed.
213 posted on
04/02/2005 5:16:55 PM PST by
syriacus
(Weird George Felos repeatedly flicked his tongue out his gaping mouth when lying to the press 3/31)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson