[Dave S]

There's dispute, which Greer obviously ignored that she was in a PVS so that by itself imo should have disqualified the Grim Reaper's "decision

Let me explain this to you once and for all. The fact that Judge Greer didnt agree with your interpretation of Terr's state doesnt mean that he didnt consider other views. If there are two views and they are counter one another, you have to decide which evidence is more credible. The three docs that said PVS were more credible than the ones that said not so. Its quite conceivalbe that another judge hearing the same evidence would have made the same decision. When a "world reknown nobel nominated" quack is one of your experts, it doesnt do much to support the credibility of your case.

[syriacus]

The three docs that said PVS were more credible than the ones that said not so.

Ah, yes, Cranford. Who has publicly said PVS patients and Alzheimer's patients have no constitutional rights.