[Fred Nerks]

It's what one calls a hypothesis I guess. Diagnosis requires further tests, (tests that were recommended and not effected as per the instructions of the 'husband') - the hypothesis stands IMO until disproved by physical evidence. Physical evidence at autopsy, now that Terri is dead. Physical evidence that could have been obtained through an MRI scan...which was denied her. I am very much afraid that any autopsy results we are provided with will deal only with her cranium. A spinal injury would need to be explained...how and when did it happen?

[Balata]

Autopsies are the final authority on the correctness of the diagnosis. I hope this one is very detailed.