Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: general_re

general_re,

I believe that your points are well taken. I apologize for any rush to judgment on my part. I do believe that a dialogue predicated upon "separating legal correctness from moral correctness" is worthwhile. I suggest that neither one of us categorically reject an unpleasant opinion by the other but focus instead on the scope of supporting material. Deal?

Warm regards,
TS


2,903 posted on 04/04/2005 10:28:48 PM PDT by terrasol (The fool is not who does not know, but who gives up a chance to grow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2901 | View Replies ]


To: terrasol
Deal?

The evofreep gang that is traveling together on this thread is not interested in 'deals'. It's not taught by Adam Graham... How To Win Online Debates .

This link should help you and others recognize who you are debating with, and why you need not bother.

2,914 posted on 04/05/2005 5:16:18 PM PDT by NewLand (Faith in The Lord trumps all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2903 | View Replies ]

To: terrasol
I suggest that neither one of us categorically reject an unpleasant opinion by the other but focus instead on the scope of supporting material. Deal?

Love to, but I'm "not interested in deals". Or so I'm told ;)

Let us begin by stipulating that what happened in the Schiavo case was an immoral outcome, and proceed from there.

2,915 posted on 04/05/2005 5:21:12 PM PDT by general_re ("Frantic orthodoxy is never rooted in faith, but in doubt." - Reinhold Niebuhr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2903 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson