"Whether the Plaintiffs may bring claims in federal court is not the issue confronting the court today, however. The issue confronting the court is whether temporary injunctive relief is warranted."
You keep stating that, and I know that. It does not change the fact that the law required a de novo review(again admitted by the court) which was not done.
2,632 posted on 03/31/2005 9:28:15 PM PST by AndrewC
(All these moments are tossed in lime, like trains in the rear.)
Yes, it was - you didn't read Whittemore's ruling. It's here - start at page 4 and continue on to the end. He ran through a procedural review as a part of determining whether they had a substantial likelihood of prevailing, and hence whether an injunction should be granted.
2,645 posted on 03/31/2005 9:48:16 PM PST by general_re
("Frantic orthodoxy is never rooted in faith, but in doubt." - Reinhold Niebuhr)