[general_re]

Yes, it was - you didn't read Whittemore's ruling. It's here - start at page 4 and continue on to the end. He ran through a procedural review as a part of determining whether they had a substantial likelihood of prevailing, and hence whether an injunction should be granted.

[AndrewC]

Yes, it was - you didn't read Whittemore's ruling. It's here - start at page 4 and continue on to the end. He ran through a procedural review as a part of determining whether they had a substantial likelihood of prevailing, and hence whether an injunction should be granted.

Kindly look at my link in post 2597 which is to the federal court in question itself and tell me how different it is from your link. In any case I have read it and a review is not a de novo review. They were asking for time so that it could be reviewed. Why do you think the restraining order would be temporary? What? If they actually prove that her rights were violated they get a slightly longer restraining order?